www.mozilla.com Weather Central

Temp: 90°F

Wind: S 17 MPH G 24

Sky: Fair

Headlines

Commission says 'yes' -6/27/2008, 7:26 AM

Commissioners waive moratorium -6/3/2008, 11:43 AM

Wind farm company requests waiver -4/17/2008, 12:01 PM

Meridian Way Wind Farm to border U.S. Highway 81 -4/13/2008, 5:21 AM

Wind developer eyes two new locations -2/20/2008, 3:22 AM

Protest draws out wind talk -1/23/2008, 2:06 AM

Denial of permit sparks wind debate -1/23/2008, 2:06 AM

Supporters: No coal, lines means doom -1/23/2008, 2:06 AM

Iberdrola plans more towers -11/8/2007, 11:41 PM

Missouri wind farm is windfall for rural community -11/7/2007, 11:27 PM

Kansas has wind potential, if it is willing to act on it -11/6/2007, 11:26 PM

Wind talk becomes heated -11/6/2007, 11:26 PM

Wind farm company considers paying neighbors -11/6/2007, 11:26 PM

Reaction mixed on wind decision -11/6/2007, 11:26 PM

Hammond: Wind will blow -11/6/2007, 11:16 PM

Gone with the wind -11/6/2007, 11:16 PM

Wind farm decision towering -9/2/2007, 10:41 AM

Wind farm decision Sept. 4 -8/29/2007, 2:48 PM

CPV rep won't be at meeting -8/29/2007, 11:51 AM

Wind decision later this month ... maybe -8/29/2007, 4:18 PM

Springview wind turbines to be retired -8/29/2007, 10:35 AM

Commissioners: Wind farm's fate will wait -7/17/2007, 3:01 PM

Legislature studies effects of wind farms on health -7/17/2007, 4:05 PM

Protest petitions to be discussed -7/17/2007, 4:06 PM

Landowners may get offer from wind company -7/17/2007, 3:01 PM

Vandals deface wind signs -7/17/2007, 3:01 PM

Another wind farm petition reaches county clerk's desk -7/17/2007, 3:06 PM

Protest petition being verified -7/17/2007, 3:06 PM

Advocate of wind says make effort -7/17/2007, 3:06 PM

Supporters file own petition for wind farm -7/17/2007, 3:01 PM

Opponents file protest petition -7/17/2007, 3:01 PM

Opponents gain legal assistance -7/17/2007, 3:06 PM

Officials expect petition -7/17/2007, 3:06 PM

Commission addresses wind protest petition -7/17/2007, 3:06 PM

Wind farm gets nod -7/17/2007, 3:06 PM

Wind farm concerns brought before commission -7/17/2007, 3:06 PM

Wind farm decision looming -7/17/2007, 3:01 PM

-7/17/2007, 3:06 PM

Wind talk brings many voices -7/17/2007, 3:06 PM

Wind power bills just hot air, environmentalists say -7/17/2007, 3:01 PM

Attorney discusses wind farm with commissioners -7/17/2007, 3:01 PM

Wind meeting resumes Wednesday at Ellis County Fairgrounds -7/17/2007, 3:01 PM

Wind farm, zoning cause concerns -7/17/2007, 3:06 PM

Wind farm zoning timeline -7/17/2007, 3:01 PM

Concerns fly about birds -7/17/2007, 3:06 PM

Where the wind blows -7/17/2007, 3:06 PM

CPV says turbines will be pulled back -7/17/2007, 3:01 PM

How other counties in Kansas are benefiting from wind farms -7/17/2007, 3:01 PM

Wind farm gets economical endorsement -7/17/2007, 3:01 PM

Neighbors voice opposition to wind farm -7/17/2007, 3:06 PM

Wind farms can generate more power, but may be deadly to bats and birds -7/17/2007, 4:03 PM

Opponents air wind concerns -7/17/2007, 3:06 PM

Location selection due to wind surveys -7/17/2007, 3:06 PM

Tests to determine wind farm's effect on power grid -7/17/2007, 4:13 PM

Wind farm talk gaining more speed -7/17/2007, 4:12 PM

New counsel for wind farm issues -7/17/2007, 4:14 PM

CPV Wind sold to new company -7/17/2007, 4:14 PM

Jeter resigns from wind farm counsel -7/17/2007, 4:21 PM

Commissioners hear wind farm feedback -7/17/2007, 4:16 PM

Weather forces wind meeting's end -7/17/2007, 4:22 PM

Wind farm debate blows into Hays -7/17/2007, 4:10 PM

Commission to discuss wind farm -7/17/2007, 4:22 PM

Developers ready to file for permit -7/17/2007, 4:23 PM

Wind farm application filed -7/17/2007, 4:20 PM


SPOTLIGHT
[var top_story_head]

Landowners may get offer from wind company

Printer-friendly version

By KALEY LYON

Hays Daily News

Plans are in the works for Iberdrola, the company heading the proposed Ellis County wind farm, to enter contract negotiations with landowners adjacent to the project area.

Project manager Krista Gordon said the contracts are not yet finalized, but arrangements are being made and landowners are being approached, she said.

"It's designed to compensate anybody for any potential inconvenience caused by the project," she said. "We understand that construction activity has the potential to be disruptive."

Some landowners, however, say that these attempts to negotiate are too little, too late.

Though details are not final, these agreements likely would be in the form of residential electricity provision for people who live near the site and a one-time financial compensation for individuals who own land in the area but don't reside there, she said.

"It's just something we thought we should do to be a good corporate citizen and a good neighbor, because we recognize we are a great big neighbor," Gordon said.

Gordon also said the agreements will not contain a "gag order" stipulation that would prevent landowners from voicing opposition.

"Right now, we don't have anything in the agreement that prohibits anybody from speaking their mind about the project," she said. "In other projects there have been those things ... we don't plan to do that now."

"I'm an ardent supporter of First Amendment rights, so I believe in letting people say what they want about something," Gordon said.

Keith Pfannenstiel, who lives on Mount Pleasant Road, said that he and his wife aren't interested in these negotiations.

An Iberdrola representative has visited with them about the possibility of an agreement, but he does not know the specifics of the offer, he said.

He's not just worried about his own interests -- the bigger issue is the effect the project could have on the community and county as a whole, he said.

"A financial agreement between a few landowners is not going to affect the total impact of what it's going to do to the community," he said.

Pfannenstiel said his objections to the project are rooted in the origins of the issue -- he's upset with the way the whole operation has been handled, he said.

"This is a location issue, and they have turned this into a huge circus on wind energy," Pfannenstiel said. "It's made a lot of people look bad because they claim they're against wind energy and not wanting to help the world. This issue has always been about it being right next to Hays and how many people and how many homes this is going to affect."

Timing also is a key issue. Pfannenstiel said negotiation should have been attempted long ago. He also believes the offers recently made were a result of the protest petition that was circulating at the time, he said.

"I'm sure that's the way the majority of people feel, especially people who have signed the protest petition," Pfannenstiel said. "We all realize that if CPV were serious, they would have come a long time ago."

It's not uncommon for wind energy development companies to enter agreements with abutting landowners. In fact, some landowners near Montezuma's Gray County Wind Farm have contracted to receive financial reimbursement.

One of these landowners in Shannon Evans, who lives less than 2,000 feet away from the turbines, he said.

"As far as I'm concerned, it's a win-win situation for everyone," Evans said. "I do not understand why there would be opposition."

Landowners had the option of receiving an annual sum or collecting a one-time payment, he said.

In return, he agreed not to construct any large structures on his property that could obstruct the wind, he said.

Opposition to that project was minimal --¬the company approached these landowners months before construction began and negotiated a financial agreement that would compensate for "perceived hassles and problems," Evans said.

This payment was not necessarily a reaction to local concerns, rather, the project's parent company, FPL Energy, had made an effort to combat concerns they'd had in other areas, he said.

The company also had "done their homework" -- surrounding landowners were provided with detailed information, such as decibel levels and how many seconds each day a shadow would stretch across their property, Evans said.

Reporter Kaley Lyon can be reached at (785) 628-1081, Ext. 138, or by e-mail at klyon@dailynews.net.

Leave a comment!
Subject:
Comment:
Poster: (your name)
captcha 05e7d833c22b4f7d8590497d987a21d7
Enter text above:

Discuss this story at MyTown

digg delicious facebook stumbleupon google Newsvine
More News and Photos

Associated Press Videos