www.mozilla.com Hot Stories Weather Central

Temp: 34.0°F

Wind: S 4.6 MPH (4 KT)

Sky: Fair

Headlines

The art and economics of cheek turning -11/20/2009, 11:11 AM

Some horrors conveniently excused -11/20/2009, 11:11 AM

A moment, please, for Gen X memories -11/19/2009, 2:30 PM

Fort Hood: Terrorism or tragedy? -11/19/2009, 2:30 PM

'Dear Hays High' a shocker in Biloxi -11/18/2009, 9:20 AM

Muslim-American generalities are unfair -11/18/2009, 9:20 AM

State cuts will ripple through every budget -11/17/2009, 10:09 AM

The U.S. House of Presumptuous Meddlers -11/17/2009, 10:09 AM

Myths and realities about hospice care -11/12/2009, 2:30 PM

Meeting expectations in retirement requires careful planning -11/14/2009, 2:27 PM

Calm voice amid chaotic crisis -11/10/2009, 2:27 PM

History lesson -11/12/2009, 2:27 PM

Cutting to the heart of the matter -11/12/2009, 2:26 PM

Still Federalist after all these years -11/13/2009, 2:26 PM

Contempt for the Constitution -11/13/2009, 2:25 PM

Hovering on the edge of disaster -11/15/2009, 2:25 PM

A lost message and a lost opportunity -11/16/2009, 2:24 PM

A father, a daughter and a clash of cultures -11/16/2009, 2:24 PM


Voices

View this site in another language.

SPOTLIGHT
[var top_story_head]

Keynesian spending vs economic collapse

Published on -11/6/2009, 2:31 PM

Printer-friendly version
E-Mail This Story

In good times, we Americans sing "Hallelujah, praise the Lord" and buy stuff. Sometimes we need it. If we don't, well, it looks so soooo cool on TV. No cash? No problem, we got plastic. God will come through on principal and interest later.

For decades, consumer spending was a critical 70 percent of our "robust" economy. Then the deregulated, under-regulated financial sector predictably collapsed. Speculators (including banks) who thought they had money really didn't. Neither had they credit. The whirlpool began.

Businesses are in business to sell goods or services. If they sell more, they hire more workers, or pay them better. But if businesses sell less, not only does the boss earn less, she cuts jobs, or hours, or benefits -- or wages. Those who earn less (or nothing) spend less. Result? Still more businesses sell less, cut jobs ... or hours ... or wages ... or benefits. And so the whirlpool spins faster and wider, sucking down more and more employers and employees.

If we truly want to resurrect our consumerist economy, we have to buy lots of stuff again. But today Americans have lost jobs or work part time. They struggle to pay bills. They've lost health insurance. Those with jobs and 401(k)s saw their retirement portfolios drop by half. Wall Street has now on fresh lipstick, but by now we know beauty is skin deep.

Retirees saw CD rates fall to less than inflation. Old geezers aren't buying anything they can live without. And don't bet Great Depression survivors aren't sticking tens and twenties in the mattress.

The top 1 percent of Americans have more money than the bottom 95 percent of us put together -- the greatest redistribution of wealth upward since just before the Great Depression. The rich could buy more, but what would they do with it all? Their garages will only hold fifty or so Porsches, their tummies only so much caviar and single-malt scotch. Besides, redistributing any wealth is counter to their religious principles. (In fairness, some less-connected cats skinnied up when their businesses bellied up.)

Well, John Maynard Keynes (pronounced "kanes") had an idea that got us out of the Great Depression. Since you and I go to jail for printing money, Keynes figured our government ought to do that. The money should be used to create jobs. Workers should make stuff or do things that people really needed, like build bridges and roads, and communication systems.

And then those jobs would put some of that newly printed money into people's pockets, and those people who had extra money might buy more stuff. And then businesses who sold the stuff might hire people to make more stuff. It would help most if they bought stuff made by their friends and neighbors at home rather than slave-labor in foreign lands -- although even that could help a wee bit through U.S. marketing profits.

That's domestic Keynesianism. Another variety is military Keynesianism. (Think Iraq, Afghanistan.) Instead of building bridges at home, deficit dollars are spent blowing up bridges abroad. Defense contractors get big contracts. Some spread money around at home hiring people to make stuff that goes bang. If it works really well, U.S. corporations get to rebuild the bridges we blew up and sometimes even pay taxes on their profits. Some brave kids (mostly not the sons or daughters of the privileged classes) get killed or lose a leg or two, but that's war. Foreigners get killed, too, but that doesn't hurt our economy. It works better for tough-minded people like Dick Cheney remaining at a respectful distance.

The best of all worlds, of course, is never to get in a pickle in the first place. Citizens and countries should live within their means, not be greedy and hog all the money. But the human animal is often (a) pretty stupid or (b) pretty greedy or some combination thereof. Thus, wealth often gets continually redistributed to the powerful and greedy few, while the un-powerful many prefer stuff to smarts.

A gaggle of wild-eyed Americans predict a Hitlery-Stalinly-Islamofascist-Castrolitic-Maoistic-atheistic-Ayatollish (breath here) toilet-bowlish hell foretold in the Book of Revelation, reported by Fox News, and spread like swine flu on the Internet. "Joseph McCarthy," they say, "must rise from the grave where he has slept since 1957 to begin anew the witch hunt."

Deficit spending plays into their paranoia.

Well, as they say, skit happens, and we all play a role. Nobody has a bigger or more important role than a government truly of the people, by the people, and most importantly, for the people. It's been a long time since we've had a government like that. Liberal Michael Moore calls it capitalist greed; libertarian Ron Paul calls it corporatism. They're talking about the same thing. And, in my opinion, that's why we're in the skit.

Let's hope deficit spending works to kick start the economy.

If it doesn't, the skit hits the fan and becomes a full-blown tragedy.

Bob Hooper is a fourth-generation western Kansan who writes from his home in Bogue. celtic@ruraltel.net

6 comment(s) found
One more comment: 11/14/2009
"CHaggard" charges Obama "czars" (hardly Marxist those) with Marxist views. Yet he provides precisely NO specifics. The emotional blather from the paranoid right is not merely sad, but dangerous. CHaggard, you are hereby called to account. Put up or shut up.
(Posted by: Voltairetoday)
Keynesian critics: 11/10/2009
Given the dimensions of the fiscal crisis what alternatives do RuckerJ and CHaggard propose? (I cannot conceive of any rreputable economist calling George W. Bush a supporter of Keynesian economics! And I'd have to be convinced that Nixon was also a Keynesian.) Your comments strike me as coming from the Party of No. I do thank you for reading and commenting.
(Posted by: Bob Hooper)
Keynsian economics - bad idea: 11/9/2009
I taught economics for over twenty years and Keynsian Economics is not the wonderful system you purport. President Nixon was a proud Keynsian, as was President George W Bush, and now President Obama is Keynsian. The Power grabs which occurred or which are occuring during these Presidencies exhibit why Keynsian Economics should not be implemented. Japan implemented Keynsian Economics in the late 1980s, and their economy never recovered. It greatly hurt Japan. I can give you dozens of examples of its failure. You are correct that greed is a problem in this country, but Keynsian Economics simply does not work. Mr Hooper, you really should study economics and history as you do not have a full grasp on this subject matter.
(Posted by: RuckerJ)
Paranoia?: 11/9/2009
Wrong again. Paranoia is suspecting something which has no basis. McCarthy was a devious senator who used fear to elevate his political position. The White House advisors and czars imbedded with Obama are open with their marxist ideology in speeches and interviews. I read the complete text of their speeches (not on Fox News but on CNN website), and it is clear they are radical in their beliefs. I am a democrat but this administration IS extremist. I see no defense of their actions.
(Posted by: CHaggard)
"What's in a name...: 11/6/2009
Montague Capulet? A rose by any other would smell the same.." On a more serious note, pigs and humans share much of the same physiology and can trade some diseases (I hestitate to say that humans and pigs share some other characteristics, too) Thanks for reading the column, and I'll tell you that I had two patties of sausage just this morning. Paranoia is not my dish.
(Posted by: Bob Hooper)
correct your terminology: 11/6/2009
You just sunk profit from the northwest Kansas swine industry again. They have been hit hard enough with out your help. It is refered to as H1N1.
(Posted by: black/white)

COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Subject:
Comment:
Poster: (your name)
captcha 39d7f6af55ae4c91a8e3dd5ba42f4e8d
Enter text above:

All comments are subject to approval before being posted. Please keep comments constructive and relevant. Opinions certainly can be expressed, but comments that are rude, abusive, slanderous, threatening, sexually oriented, contain profanity or are vulgar will not be tolerated. Comments will not be edited. Any comment that violates the above-listed rules will be deleted.

Discuss this story at MyTown

digg delicious facebook stumbleupon google Newsvine
More News and Photos

Associated Press Videos