www.mozilla.com Hot Stories Weather Central

Temp: 50.0°F

Wind: S 8.1 MPH (7 KT)

Sky: Fair

Headlines

Hunting infers courtesy, respect -11/8/2009, 2:19 PM

Food for thought -- or thought for food -11/8/2009, 2:19 PM

Keynesian spending vs economic collapse -11/6/2009, 2:31 PM

Economic myths and irrelevancy -11/6/2009, 10:49 AM

Brave words from a BoSox backer -11/5/2009, 8:04 AM

Administration tries a radical approach -11/5/2009, 7:46 AM

Getting soaked -11/5/2009, 7:46 AM

Heil was more than a professor -11/5/2009, 7:45 AM

One more year, one more wrinkle -11/4/2009, 10:53 AM

Marxism, communism in America, Part II -10/29/2009, 2:18 PM

Down the eco-devo rabbit hole -11/3/2009, 1:29 PM

Protecting the ordinary citizen -11/2/2009, 7:30 AM

A plague on both their houses -11/2/2009, 7:30 AM

Coming up with the next big thing -11/1/2009, 7:29 AM

Making time by turning back the clock -11/1/2009, 7:29 AM


Voices

View this site in another language.

SPOTLIGHT
[var top_story_head]

Reversing reverse discrimination

Published on -7/2/2009, 10:05 AM

Printer-friendly version
E-Mail This Story

The Supreme Court rules in favor of white firefighters from New Haven, Conn., in a decision earlier this week. Critics of affirmative action claim it's a victory. But it's a Pyrrhic victory, because the real story of the case is employers are exposed to lawsuits from every direction today. Employers have to operate in a climate of fear regarding affirmative action today. When New Haven threw out employment tests because they feared the low-scoring African-American candidates would sue for discrimination if they didn't, they opened themselves up to a lawsuit by white job candidates, which is exactly what they got. The court ruled that throwing out the test was reverse discrimination. The court got that right. But they missed the bigger picture here. The question to be answered is how exactly is an employer supposed to avoid a lengthy and expensive lawsuit when any action invites a legal response from either side? Employers are damned if they do and damned if they don't anymore. Of course, in this economy, there are no jobs to offer, so maybe it's a moot point.

Sanford's downfall

One guy who GOP insiders were starting to rally behind for 2012 is Mark Sanford. Emphasis on "were." By concocting a bizarre story to go visit his girlfriend and then getting caught in an affair, Sanford's chances of getting the GOP nomination are about the same as Hillary Clinton's. I wonder if he really thought he could get away with it, in which case he's dumber than he's been given credit for.

It's not over yet

With a new fiscal quarter coming, it can only mean more impending revenue shortfalls. Gov. Mark Parkinson likely will have to trim spending as state income is expected to be about $130 million shy of the budget. Of course, it could be worse: Indiana, Pennsylvania, Mississippi, California and Arizona are all issuing IOUs or facing a possible government shutdown because their state legislators and governors cannot come to agreement on solving their budget problems. So it could be worse.

Chapman Rackaway is an associate professor of political science at Fort Hays State University.

0 comment(s) found

COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Subject:
Comment:
Poster: (your name)
captcha ffab6ec6e4f2434f9e7b939dfc1a574a
Enter text above:

All comments are subject to approval before being posted. Please keep comments constructive and relevant. Opinions certainly can be expressed, but comments that are rude, abusive, slanderous, threatening, sexually oriented, contain profanity or are vulgar will not be tolerated. Comments will not be edited. Any comment that violates the above-listed rules will be deleted.

Discuss this story at MyTown

digg delicious facebook stumbleupon google Newsvine
More News and Photos

Associated Press Videos