www.mozilla.com Weather Central
Voices
Headlines

What happened, Mr. President? -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

August 2014 primaries will be the test -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

Tornado season -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

Celebrating 90 years of Rotary -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

Facts matter -5/20/2013, 9:18 AM

What in the world was the IRS thinking? -5/20/2013, 9:18 AM

Jolie decision sparks hostility, suspicion -5/20/2013, 9:18 AM

Privatization can work, but only if done right -5/19/2013, 3:11 PM

Still fighting over a lost cause -5/19/2013, 3:11 PM

A Kansas education -5/19/2013, 3:11 PM

Anti-American lessons abound -5/17/2013, 9:34 AM

George Carlin said that? Wowzer! -5/17/2013, 9:34 AM

A safer Fourth -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

For a good cause -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

Conservative's response -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

The time has come to tax the titans -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

Free to fly in the face of convention -5/15/2013, 9:44 AM

County approval -5/15/2013, 9:44 AM

Ignoring the real, fighting the imaginary -5/15/2013, 9:43 AM

Congratulations -5/15/2013, 9:43 AM

Scrutiny of IRS -5/14/2013, 2:15 PM

We must learn from our shared history -5/14/2013, 10:01 AM

The big test -5/14/2013, 10:01 AM

Policymaking crosses paths with busywork -5/14/2013, 10:01 AM

Failed attempt to run away from life -5/13/2013, 9:46 AM

Carpe apple, swallow the seeds -5/13/2013, 9:46 AM

Old adage applies - buyer beware -5/12/2013, 6:50 AM

Tilting at constitutional windmills -5/12/2013, 3:53 PM

County proposal -5/12/2013, 3:53 PM

An honest examination of race -5/10/2013, 9:40 AM

Maintaining the tradition of charitable giving -5/10/2013, 9:40 AM

Help is available -5/10/2013, 9:40 AM

Play it safe on the farm -5/9/2013, 6:48 AM

Where's the progress? -5/9/2013, 9:50 AM

Big doins' at the Golden Rule Cafe -5/9/2013, 9:50 AM

No new tax? -5/9/2013, 9:50 AM

Religious assault -5/9/2013, 9:32 AM

Pondering the new 'bleeding' Kansas -5/8/2013, 10:04 AM

War on Terror: Up close and personal -5/8/2013, 9:39 AM

County in need -5/8/2013, 12:40 PM

Selfless service -5/7/2013, 10:10 AM

Life-changing -5/7/2013, 10:10 AM

Kansas tax policy on the road to nowhere -5/7/2013, 10:09 AM

Administration hands over political ammo -5/7/2013, 10:09 AM

In Texas, black means future danger -5/6/2013, 9:30 AM

Can schools draw line on abortion protests? -5/6/2013, 9:29 AM

Crucial investment -5/6/2013, 9:29 AM

When will it stop -5/5/2013, 3:41 PM

Cork still stuck -5/5/2013, 3:41 PM

Red-state radicalism hastens rural decline -5/5/2013, 3:41 PM

Evolving door -5/5/2013, 3:41 PM

The big picture? -5/3/2013, 7:56 AM

Following up on what's the matter with Kansas -5/3/2013, 7:56 AM

The Wonderful Writers of Oz -5/2/2013, 10:23 AM

Busy month of activities in Kansas Room -5/2/2013, 10:23 AM

Backing the bond -5/2/2013, 10:23 AM

Keystone decision -5/2/2013, 9:26 AM

Defending bad laws -5/1/2013, 9:45 AM

Hefty return -5/1/2013, 9:45 AM

Shining a light -5/1/2013, 9:44 AM

Lessons we learned after Boston -5/1/2013, 9:44 AM

Exposed -4/30/2013, 10:55 AM

Tight-lipped gov masters the 'no comment' -4/30/2013, 10:55 AM

Contributing factor -4/30/2013, 10:55 AM

Changing America -4/30/2013, 10:55 AM

Bills focus on protection, education -4/30/2013, 10:46 AM

Even in tragedy, a nation divided -4/29/2013, 9:08 AM

Wolves in journalistic clothing -4/29/2013, 9:08 AM

KanCare puzzle -4/28/2013, 11:35 AM

'I told you so! Why didn't you listen?' -4/28/2013, 11:35 AM

Special election -4/28/2013, 9:45 AM

Easy answer -4/26/2013, 7:26 AM

Upgrade a necessity -4/26/2013, 7:26 AM

Veiled purpose -4/26/2013, 7:26 AM

Taking steps to prevent bone loss -4/26/2013, 9:45 AM

Safe Ride -4/26/2013, 9:45 AM

Considering the baby-faced bomber -4/25/2013, 10:59 AM

Stop, Shop and Grow campaign kicks off -4/25/2013, 10:59 AM

A conservative's response -4/25/2013, 10:59 AM

The family that eats together stays together -4/24/2013, 9:52 AM

Still learning lessons about education -4/24/2013, 9:52 AM

The Army goes off the grid -4/24/2013, 9:51 AM

Taxing the 'Net -4/24/2013, 9:51 AM

Estimates mean tax debate isn't over -4/23/2013, 9:56 AM

Public business or 'private' conversation? -4/23/2013, 9:56 AM

Do more with less -4/23/2013, 9:56 AM

Sales pitch -4/23/2013, 9:55 AM

Rand Paul gets schooled at Howard -4/22/2013, 1:19 PM

Movement on judges, not liquor sales -4/22/2013, 1:19 PM

Sales tax or property tax? -4/21/2013, 5:08 PM

Where are the leaders, the outrage? -4/21/2013, 5:08 PM

A closer look who really creates the jobs -4/21/2013, 5:08 PM

Mistakes aplenty -4/21/2013, 5:08 PM

Hope and forgiveness for all -4/19/2013, 10:27 AM

Matter with Kansas? You're kidding, right? -4/19/2013, 10:27 AM

Background checks -4/19/2013, 10:27 AM

Empty chamber -4/19/2013, 10:26 AM

Perfection -4/19/2013, 10:26 AM

At what cost? -4/18/2013, 10:12 AM

Too much sympathy for the devil -4/18/2013, 10:12 AM

myTown Calendar

SPOTLIGHT
[var top_story_head]

Muddled debate

Published on -7/26/2012, 11:02 AM

Printer-friendly version
E-Mail This Story

It seems pretty disingenuous for candidate Romney to allow his writers to take advantage of the indefinite pronoun "that." They not only infer, but state that the president was referring to small business when he said, "You didn't build that."

I believe it was obvious to actual listeners that the president was referring to the enabling infrastructure that exists for American businesses, the infrastructure the nation makes available to them and is the product of the world of construction, education and labor of all types.

While businesses use it, build on it and profit because of it, it was provided to them by others. So, they had a lot to start with and, no, they "didn't build that."

No one is an island was the point of the remark, and to try and twist that into a seemingly ignorant remark is contrived, awkward and flat-out dishonest. Just because it's politics doesn't make it OK. I discredit Romney's writers in all this. I don't see candidate Romney coming up with this little twist on his own. I believe he relies on writers or strategists, apparently conflicted ones, that help him think, but not in a particularly consistent way.

This time though they overreached by a mile. It wouldn't even make sense the way they spun it. The president obviously values small business and values their support. He does have some problems appreciating large business owners, such as Romney, who tend to vote for themselves rather than America. He would not denigrate small business owners when his campaign consistently recognizes their obvious contributions to our economy.

The president's concern for small business is reflected in his signing many tax credits and tax cuts initiated specifically for small business. His proposed tax increases do not affect owners of small business, contrary to GOP spin. They know many of us think if we hear it on TV it is a fact.

So while only a fraction of business owners bring home an adjusted gross income over $250,000 annually -- the top 2 percent would have us think that group is large, is somehow "us," "middle-class" or "small" business. It sounds like it could be true, but it's not even close.

They are aware of the facts, but treat it like some sort of opinion and just say it anyway. I don't know about you, but I think our political process deserves clearer debate than that.

Jean Binder

Hays

digg delicious facebook stumbleupon google Newsvine
More News and Photos

Associated Press Videos