Good government
Published on -10/14/2009, 8:05 AM
Printer-friendly version
E-Mail This Story
Good government
Some of us seem to be afraid of "government involvement in health care." I, however, am not afraid, because I am from Rush County.
Here we have an older than average population, making Medicare a leading provider of health insurance (Just in case: Medicare is a government program). A vast majority of residents in the local nursing home are using Medicare to pay the bills. The same is true in long-term care at the local hospital. We are also fortunate that Medicare considers our hospital a critical access hospital, making the facility eligible for larger Medicare reimbursements.
Both the hospital and nursing homes are nonprofit public institutions. The improvements recently started at the hospital are financed by bonds approved by the voters.
The doctors practice in a building owned by Rush County. The EMS is a publicly financed department of the county government. The local pharmacy was opened with the assistance of the economic development committee, a government entity.
If our health care in Rush County relied on the "free market" without government involvement, we would have no health care. No hospital, no nursing home, no doctor, no ambulance, not even a drug store.
Here is an example; if a chemical drum were to explode and I was injured at work, would HCA, Aetna, Blue Cross or GlaxoSmithKline come to help me? No. There is no profit in maintaining an ambulance with trained EMS personnel in Rush County, Kansas. It is only a tax-supported government that would care enough to bear the expense of providing emergency services here.
Government involvement in health care? I like it, because I'm from Rush County.
A.B. Campbell
Bison
This is an example of an instance where yes, it was beneficial. However, case-by-case is a much more fail-proof option than mandatory government intervention. There is a time and place to explore options like Rush County is employing. And I agree Bob, when it IS a government 'by the people' instead of both sides of the aisle filled with corruption and special interests, many would again have faith in our system. Unfortunately, they have decayed that trust to an almost un-ressurectable status. I think we can all agree that government, employed properly, was an incredible facet of our country's growth, but our 'elected' leaders continue to stray further from the interests of dems, repubs, inds, everyone.
(Posted by: )
: 10/15/2009
Bravo! Good point.
(Posted by: )
Quite welcome: 10/14/2009
Mr. Campbell, your letter is on target. Unfortunately, a movement of morons does its best to convince everybody that "government" is bad. Well, it can be, depending on who's running it. If it's the special interests whose number one goal is to get richer, we've got a problem. If it's those who do their best to represent the public interest, it's quite often "the best answer." It's called a government of the people, for the people, and by the people.
(Posted by: Bob Hooper)
COMMENT ON THIS STORY
All comments are subject to approval before being posted. Please keep comments constructive and relevant. Opinions certainly can be expressed, but comments that are rude, abusive, slanderous, threatening, sexually oriented, contain profanity or are vulgar will not be tolerated. Comments will not be edited. Any comment that violates the above-listed rules will be deleted.









