www.mozilla.com Weather Central
Voices
Headlines

Taking stock and looking ahead -5/24/2013, 10:02 AM

Holiday precaution -5/24/2013, 10:02 AM

Just who are the idiots in this scenario? -5/24/2013, 10:02 AM

Plan lacking -5/24/2013, 10:02 AM

Fat cats must sublet my people go -5/23/2013, 9:50 AM

Scandal season at Obama White House -5/23/2013, 9:50 AM

Hope for the best -5/22/2013, 3:20 PM

Pulling out the radio and remembering -5/22/2013, 10:41 AM

In Florida, timely injustice -5/22/2013, 10:40 AM

What happened, Mr. President? -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

August 2014 primaries will be the test -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

Tornado season -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

Celebrating 90 years of Rotary -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

Facts matter -5/20/2013, 9:18 AM

What in the world was the IRS thinking? -5/20/2013, 9:18 AM

Jolie decision sparks hostility, suspicion -5/20/2013, 9:18 AM

Privatization can work, but only if done right -5/19/2013, 3:11 PM

Still fighting over a lost cause -5/19/2013, 3:11 PM

A Kansas education -5/19/2013, 3:11 PM

Anti-American lessons abound -5/17/2013, 9:34 AM

George Carlin said that? Wowzer! -5/17/2013, 9:34 AM

A safer Fourth -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

For a good cause -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

Conservative's response -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

The time has come to tax the titans -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

Free to fly in the face of convention -5/15/2013, 9:44 AM

County approval -5/15/2013, 9:44 AM

Ignoring the real, fighting the imaginary -5/15/2013, 9:43 AM

Congratulations -5/15/2013, 9:43 AM

Scrutiny of IRS -5/14/2013, 2:15 PM

We must learn from our shared history -5/14/2013, 10:01 AM

The big test -5/14/2013, 10:01 AM

Policymaking crosses paths with busywork -5/14/2013, 10:01 AM

Failed attempt to run away from life -5/13/2013, 9:46 AM

Carpe apple, swallow the seeds -5/13/2013, 9:46 AM

Old adage applies - buyer beware -5/12/2013, 6:50 AM

Tilting at constitutional windmills -5/12/2013, 3:53 PM

County proposal -5/12/2013, 3:53 PM

An honest examination of race -5/10/2013, 9:40 AM

Maintaining the tradition of charitable giving -5/10/2013, 9:40 AM

Help is available -5/10/2013, 9:40 AM

Play it safe on the farm -5/9/2013, 6:48 AM

Where's the progress? -5/9/2013, 9:50 AM

Big doins' at the Golden Rule Cafe -5/9/2013, 9:50 AM

No new tax? -5/9/2013, 9:50 AM

Religious assault -5/9/2013, 9:32 AM

Pondering the new 'bleeding' Kansas -5/8/2013, 10:04 AM

War on Terror: Up close and personal -5/8/2013, 9:39 AM

County in need -5/8/2013, 12:40 PM

Selfless service -5/7/2013, 10:10 AM

Life-changing -5/7/2013, 10:10 AM

Kansas tax policy on the road to nowhere -5/7/2013, 10:09 AM

Administration hands over political ammo -5/7/2013, 10:09 AM

In Texas, black means future danger -5/6/2013, 9:30 AM

Can schools draw line on abortion protests? -5/6/2013, 9:29 AM

Crucial investment -5/6/2013, 9:29 AM

When will it stop -5/5/2013, 3:41 PM

Cork still stuck -5/5/2013, 3:41 PM

Red-state radicalism hastens rural decline -5/5/2013, 3:41 PM

Evolving door -5/5/2013, 3:41 PM

The big picture? -5/3/2013, 7:56 AM

Following up on what's the matter with Kansas -5/3/2013, 7:56 AM

The Wonderful Writers of Oz -5/2/2013, 10:23 AM

Busy month of activities in Kansas Room -5/2/2013, 10:23 AM

Backing the bond -5/2/2013, 10:23 AM

Keystone decision -5/2/2013, 9:26 AM

Defending bad laws -5/1/2013, 9:45 AM

Hefty return -5/1/2013, 9:45 AM

Shining a light -5/1/2013, 9:44 AM

Lessons we learned after Boston -5/1/2013, 9:44 AM

Exposed -4/30/2013, 10:55 AM

Tight-lipped gov masters the 'no comment' -4/30/2013, 10:55 AM

Contributing factor -4/30/2013, 10:55 AM

Changing America -4/30/2013, 10:55 AM

Bills focus on protection, education -4/30/2013, 10:46 AM

Even in tragedy, a nation divided -4/29/2013, 9:08 AM

Wolves in journalistic clothing -4/29/2013, 9:08 AM

KanCare puzzle -4/28/2013, 11:35 AM

'I told you so! Why didn't you listen?' -4/28/2013, 11:35 AM

Special election -4/28/2013, 9:45 AM

Easy answer -4/26/2013, 7:26 AM

Upgrade a necessity -4/26/2013, 7:26 AM

Veiled purpose -4/26/2013, 7:26 AM

Taking steps to prevent bone loss -4/26/2013, 9:45 AM

Safe Ride -4/26/2013, 9:45 AM

Considering the baby-faced bomber -4/25/2013, 10:59 AM

Stop, Shop and Grow campaign kicks off -4/25/2013, 10:59 AM

A conservative's response -4/25/2013, 10:59 AM

The family that eats together stays together -4/24/2013, 9:52 AM

Still learning lessons about education -4/24/2013, 9:52 AM

The Army goes off the grid -4/24/2013, 9:51 AM

Taxing the 'Net -4/24/2013, 9:51 AM

Estimates mean tax debate isn't over -4/23/2013, 9:56 AM

Public business or 'private' conversation? -4/23/2013, 9:56 AM

Do more with less -4/23/2013, 9:56 AM

Sales pitch -4/23/2013, 9:55 AM

Rand Paul gets schooled at Howard -4/22/2013, 1:19 PM

Movement on judges, not liquor sales -4/22/2013, 1:19 PM

Sales tax or property tax? -4/21/2013, 5:08 PM

Where are the leaders, the outrage? -4/21/2013, 5:08 PM

myTown Calendar

SPOTLIGHT
[var top_story_head]

The time has come to pick a side

Published on -10/25/2012, 4:16 PM

Printer-friendly version
E-Mail This Story

Who are these undecided voters? The one thing that seems clear is there aren't many of them.

The harder question is how anyone who really does plan to vote could still be struggling with whom to vote for.

I always tell my students that for many people presidential elections are a lot like baseball is to me.

I root for the Red Sox. But if they're not going to be in the World Series (sadly, as a longtime fan, that's most of the time), then I don't pay much attention to which teams will be until the very end. And then, for reasons that are not always entirely logical (for instance, damn Yankees), I pick a team and join in the festivities.

It's time to pick a team.

And unlike some years when I hear a lot of "both parties are the same" or "what difference does it make," it's hard to make that case this year. That fact is revealed by the unusually high numbers of people who have made up their minds and aren't about to change them.

This is not an election in which Romney voters or Obama voters are telling pollsters they are still open to switching. Nor is it one in which people have neutral feelings as to the candidate they're voting for. Most Obama voters really don't like Romney, and vice versa.

And unlike some races in which both candidates have moved convincingly enough to the middle that it really isn't that easy to tell them apart, if you watch the debates, even while hitting the kitchen and the bathroom and texting on a frequent basis, you can't help but notice the differences.

Should the top 1 percent pay more in taxes? Should the Bush tax cuts be extended for everyone, or only for those making less than $250,000 (or maybe even a higher number) per year? If 93 percent of small businesses make less than $250,000 a year, is protecting small business a good enough reason to extend the tax cuts to high earning individuals?

Are you for or against a system in which every American is required to be insured, along with the limits on denial of coverage for pre-existing conditions and subsidies for those who can't afford private market prices?

Should folks in their 40s and 50s get a voucher option to Medicare? Will doing so give them more options, or result in the kind of cherry picking that lands the sickest people on Medicare, resulting in cuts to benefits?

What do you think about government support for wind? More drilling on federal lands?

Are you for or against allowing women and their doctors to decide (prior to viability) whether to carry a pregnancy to terms, or should that choice be limited to those who are the victims of rape or incest?

Should government spend more on defense? Romney says no cuts; Obama says the military doesn't want the additional spending Romney is proposing.

Is it possible to offset lower taxes for everyone and higher defense spending with (according to Obama) unstated spending cuts (except for Big Bird and public broadcasting) so that the deficit doesn't grow? Will economic growth be enough to offset those policies? Do you care?

Have the past four years been a step in the right direction on an agenda the president should be given four more years to complete, or are they proof that Obama can't do the job?

Do you blame Obama for failing to reach his goal of lower unemployment, or Bush for leaving him a bigger mess than anyone expected?

Just how disappointed (if at all) are you with the past four years?

Enough?

If you want to accuse me of stacking the deck in the president's favor, my only response is that I'm trying to be fair.

But the larger point is that it's hard for anyone who is committed to one candidate (as I obviously am) to be truly fair in this election, which is why it's so hard to understand how anyone could still be trying to make up their mind.

Economists will tell you ("Freakonomics" has a chapter on this) that one vote doesn't count. But even a relatively small group of voters can make the difference in a close election.

My mother called me in the middle of Election Day 2000 to tell me that a lot of the women in her condo building were afraid they had made a mistake on their ballot. Call Al Gore, she said. Sure, I'm going to call Gore and tell him what my mother said. My mother, may she rest in peace, lived in Palm Beach County, Fla. Sorry, Al.

Susan Estrich is a columnist, commentator and law and political science professor at USC.

digg delicious facebook stumbleupon google Newsvine
More News and Photos

Associated Press Videos