www.mozilla.com Weather Central
Voices
Headlines

D.C. should just get out of the way -6/19/2013, 9:42 AM

Frankenseeds? Well, well, well ... -6/19/2013, 9:42 AM

Fireworks revisited -6/19/2013, 9:42 AM

Cleveland the answer -6/19/2013, 9:40 AM

Costly trip -6/19/2013, 9:40 AM

Water sense -6/19/2013, 9:40 AM

Terror and safety a caustic mix -6/18/2013, 10:12 AM

The plaid coats are coming! -6/18/2013, 10:12 AM

Here's a little food for thought -6/17/2013, 4:35 PM

A look at the state of fatherhood -6/17/2013, 3:58 PM

Real or imagined -6/17/2013, 3:58 PM

State falling behind in university funding -6/16/2013, 4:29 PM

Ban on 'gruesome images' threatens free speech -6/16/2013, 4:29 PM

Arming the rebels -6/16/2013, 4:18 PM

Unnecessary tragedy -6/14/2013, 2:38 PM

Privacy matters; it really does -6/14/2013, 2:38 PM

Flag Day -6/14/2013, 2:38 PM

Lessons from the land -6/13/2013, 9:22 AM

Will America regret Snowden's leaks? -6/13/2013, 9:22 AM

Science standards -6/13/2013, 9:22 AM

Hot times -6/12/2013, 9:45 AM

Technology starting to outsmart us -6/12/2013, 9:44 AM

Praises for Victoria FD -6/12/2013, 9:44 AM

Advice for GOP: Chill -6/12/2013, 9:43 AM

Do Dems have GOP right where they want? -6/11/2013, 9:12 AM

Latest on Obamacare -6/11/2013, 9:11 AM

The morning after debate -6/11/2013, 9:10 AM

Hard hits and near misses -6/10/2013, 9:50 AM

Extremism has no race -6/10/2013, 9:48 AM

Tickets key to raising dough -6/9/2013, 2:37 PM

Stage set for 2014 campaigns -6/9/2013, 2:37 PM

Security vs. privacy -6/9/2013, 2:37 PM

'Bold Move by Boldra' revisited -6/9/2013, 2:37 PM

Understanding liberals and progressives -6/7/2013, 9:39 AM

Bachmann backs out -- thank goodness -6/7/2013, 9:39 AM

Not so fast in the land of farmers, ranchers -6/6/2013, 9:23 AM

Under-reporting in Obamaland -6/6/2013, 9:23 AM

Uneducated battle -6/6/2013, 9:23 AM

Scouts, be prepared for a future celebration -6/5/2013, 7:53 AM

Mr. Shulman goes to D.C. -6/5/2013, 7:53 AM

Call me a skeptic, but ... -6/5/2013, 7:53 AM

Kobach rebuffed -6/5/2013, 7:53 AM

Weighing in on another year in Topeka -6/4/2013, 9:36 AM

Now, we wait to see the outcome -6/4/2013, 9:36 AM

Budget concerns -6/4/2013, 9:36 AM

Deny terrorists their power -6/3/2013, 9:02 AM

You don't have to go far -6/3/2013, 9:02 AM

Cancer information, help abounds -6/2/2013, 3:58 PM

It's time for a right proper reform -6/2/2013, 3:58 PM

USD 388 decision -6/2/2013, 3:58 PM

Pay yourself first -6/1/2013, 3:27 PM

The Supreme Court's self-created quagmire -5/31/2013, 10:16 AM

Outdoor watering -5/31/2013, 10:16 AM

Americans get the IRS they deserve -5/31/2013, 10:05 AM

Music and baking at the Kansas Room -5/30/2013, 10:13 AM

The new face of poverty in America -5/30/2013, 10:12 AM

Seek out the shade, not the sun -5/30/2013, 10:12 AM

Commencement speech resonates still -5/29/2013, 9:46 AM

Why the case of Mark Carson matters -5/29/2013, 9:46 AM

Sobering reality of 2013 Legislature -5/29/2013, 9:46 AM

Costly session -5/29/2013, 9:46 AM

The mindless allure of destruction -5/28/2013, 9:41 AM

Time to wake up -5/28/2013, 9:41 AM

Public input welcomed -5/26/2013, 10:57 AM

Kansas-born priest personified courage -5/26/2013, 10:57 AM

Be careful what you wish for ... -5/26/2013, 10:57 AM

Memorial Day -5/26/2013, 7:44 AM

Taking stock and looking ahead -5/24/2013, 10:02 AM

Holiday precaution -5/24/2013, 10:02 AM

Just who are the idiots in this scenario? -5/24/2013, 10:02 AM

Plan lacking -5/24/2013, 10:02 AM

Fat cats must sublet my people go -5/23/2013, 9:50 AM

Scandal season at Obama White House -5/23/2013, 9:50 AM

Hope for the best -5/22/2013, 3:20 PM

Pulling out the radio and remembering -5/22/2013, 10:41 AM

In Florida, timely injustice -5/22/2013, 10:40 AM

What happened, Mr. President? -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

August 2014 primaries will be the test -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

Tornado season -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

Celebrating 90 years of Rotary -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

Facts matter -5/20/2013, 9:18 AM

What in the world was the IRS thinking? -5/20/2013, 9:18 AM

Jolie decision sparks hostility, suspicion -5/20/2013, 9:18 AM

Privatization can work, but only if done right -5/19/2013, 3:11 PM

Still fighting over a lost cause -5/19/2013, 3:11 PM

A Kansas education -5/19/2013, 3:11 PM

Anti-American lessons abound -5/17/2013, 9:34 AM

George Carlin said that? Wowzer! -5/17/2013, 9:34 AM

A safer Fourth -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

For a good cause -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

Conservative's response -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

The time has come to tax the titans -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

Free to fly in the face of convention -5/15/2013, 9:44 AM

County approval -5/15/2013, 9:44 AM

Ignoring the real, fighting the imaginary -5/15/2013, 9:43 AM

Congratulations -5/15/2013, 9:43 AM

Scrutiny of IRS -5/14/2013, 2:15 PM

We must learn from our shared history -5/14/2013, 10:01 AM

The big test -5/14/2013, 10:01 AM

Policymaking crosses paths with busywork -5/14/2013, 10:01 AM

myTown Calendar

SPOTLIGHT
[var top_story_head]

The presidential religious test that wasn't

Published on -8/15/2012, 8:18 AM

Printer-friendly version
E-Mail This Story

Remember all the media chatter during the primaries about how the "Mormon factor" could undermine Mitt Romney's candidacy?

Forget about it.

American voters, it turns out, are mostly unconcerned about Romney's religious affiliation or have no idea what it is.

Only 60 percent of voters are aware that Romney is a Mormon, 9 percent percent think he is something else and 32 percent can't identify his faith, according to a survey by the Pew Research Center released July 26.

Of the people who correctly identify Romney as a Mormon, 60 percent say they are comfortable with his practicing that faith and another 21 percent say it doesn't matter. Only 19 percent claim to be "uncomfortable" with the Mormon connection.

But according to the Pew study, even white evangelicals who say they are uncomfortable with Romney's faith plan to vote for him anyway -- although their level of enthusiasm is weaker than those who have no problem with the Mormon affiliation.

The Pew results suggest that despite predictions to the contrary, religious affiliation may not be much of a factor in the 2012 presidential race.

This finding tracks with the First Amendment Center's survey showing that only 17 percent of Americans say a candidate's religious affiliation will be "very important" in determining their vote in November.

According to the center's State of the First Amendment survey, also released last month, 58 percent of respondents describe religious affiliation as either "not too important" or "not at all important," with another 23 percent responding "somewhat important."

Among voters who do focus on religious affiliation, Obama may have more of a religion problem than Romney.

In the Pew poll, only 49 percent of respondents correctly identify the president as a Christian. An astounding 17 percent still believe he is a Muslim, including 34 percent of conservative Republicans. Another 3 percent say "other" and 31 percent "don't know." This despite repeated assertions and symbolic gestures from the White House underscoring Obama's Christian faith.

Not surprisingly, perhaps, of the 17 percent who wrongly identify Obama as a Muslim, 65 percent are uncomfortable with it. But since most of the discomforted aren't likely to vote for Obama anyway, this finding may have little effect on the election.

What I find most disturbing about the Pew survey is how uninformed many American voters are about the two men running for president.

Is it really possible that 40 percent of voters don't know Mitt Romney's religious affiliation? And how can 17 percent of voters continue to believe the canard that Barack Obama is a Muslim?

It can't be healthy for the democratic process when so many people aren't paying attention (or, in the case of Obama's religion, paying attention to false propaganda).

But let's not lose sight of what may be the silver lining: Informed or uninformed, a strong majority of Americans appears to reject making religious affiliation a threshold requirement for office.

Could it be that the United States is moving closer to the day when any qualified candidate can be elected regardless of religious affiliation or lack thereof?

One can only hope.

Charles C. Haynes is director of the Religious Freedom Education Project at the Washington-based Newseum. chaynes@freedomforum.org

digg delicious facebook stumbleupon google Newsvine
More News and Photos

Associated Press Videos