www.mozilla.com Weather Central
Voices
Headlines

Back to the future, locked and loaded -1/28/2015, 9:29 AM

Compromise -- make it happen -1/28/2015, 9:29 AM

Faith v. facts -1/28/2015, 9:29 AM

Counting on Les -1/27/2015, 9:22 AM

Building bills in the Legislature -1/27/2015, 9:22 AM

Tale of the tree -1/27/2015, 9:22 AM

Seismic activity -1/27/2015, 9:22 AM

Where are the good guys? -1/27/2015, 9:21 AM

Brownback's budget -1/26/2015, 9:59 AM

Committee meetings begin -1/26/2015, 9:50 AM

Excitement starts at Capitol -1/26/2015, 9:50 AM

What's happening with oil prices? -1/26/2015, 9:50 AM

Synthetic biology, brave new world -1/26/2015, 9:50 AM

Today's fierce urgency is voter mobilization -1/25/2015, 5:02 PM

Duke, Muslims and politics of intimidation -1/25/2015, 5:02 PM

Right to hunt -1/25/2015, 5:02 PM

Pipeline: Foreign profits, American risk -1/23/2015, 7:47 AM

Social Darwinist 'Christianity' -- Chapter 3 -1/23/2015, 7:47 AM

Kiwanis generosity -1/23/2015, 7:47 AM

The state economy -1/22/2015, 10:23 AM

Restate of the union -1/22/2015, 10:23 AM

France needs our First Amendment -1/22/2015, 10:23 AM

Repurposing Washington -1/20/2015, 9:31 AM

March for Life -1/20/2015, 9:31 AM

Brownback, the budget and schools -1/20/2015, 9:31 AM

Sensible checks are no assault on gun rights -1/19/2015, 9:50 AM

Jeb Bush chooses expedience on marriage issue -1/19/2015, 9:50 AM

The State of the State Address and the legislative session -1/19/2015, 8:47 AM

Spending's not the culprit in budget woes -1/18/2015, 3:32 PM

Pilgrim's paradise -1/18/2015, 3:32 PM

Spring elections -1/18/2015, 3:23 PM

Kobach is back -1/16/2015, 3:04 PM

More with Les -1/16/2015, 10:03 AM

Understanding Hooper -1/16/2015, 10:02 AM

Basic economics -1/16/2015, 10:01 AM

Female governance -1/15/2015, 9:37 AM

2015 energy policy -- a unique opportunity -1/15/2015, 9:37 AM

The better option -1/15/2015, 9:36 AM

'Wall Street' a waste -1/14/2015, 2:50 PM

Trade already -1/14/2015, 2:49 PM

No media bias? -1/14/2015, 2:48 PM

Retirement funds -1/14/2015, 2:47 PM

Redefining public education in Kansas -1/13/2015, 10:06 AM

What the future holds -1/13/2015, 10:06 AM

Efficient education -1/13/2015, 10:06 AM

Terrorists usher in the 'End of Satire' -1/12/2015, 9:14 AM

Sexuality, lame logic, substandard science -1/12/2015, 9:14 AM

A tragic family story -1/11/2015, 12:11 PM

For freedom, LGBT rights, a year of decision -1/11/2015, 12:11 PM

Roberts' promotion -1/11/2015, 12:11 PM

FHSU campaign -1/11/2015, 12:11 PM

Fairness in U.S. -1/9/2015, 3:05 PM

Liberals' use of black people -- Part II -1/9/2015, 9:09 AM

Social Darwinist 'Christians' -- Chapter 2 -1/9/2015, 9:09 AM

Taxing situation -1/9/2015, 9:09 AM

Trust: Society depends on it -1/8/2015, 9:55 AM

Education schools lack a paradigm -1/8/2015, 9:55 AM

Congress convenes -1/7/2015, 10:07 AM

Simple way to fix gridlock: change committees -1/7/2015, 10:06 AM

Kansas is your customer -1/7/2015, 10:06 AM

Large budget shortfalls await solution -1/6/2015, 10:06 AM

The state and funding K-12 education -1/6/2015, 10:06 AM

Tree removal -1/6/2015, 10:06 AM

Republicans won -- now what? -1/5/2015, 9:13 AM

Social Darwinist religion, Chapter 1 -1/5/2015, 9:13 AM

Liberals' use of black people -1/2/2015, 9:53 AM

Ignorance abounds -1/2/2015, 9:53 AM

Superbug dilemma -1/2/2015, 9:53 AM

Thanks North Korea -12/31/2014, 1:26 PM

Sony gets the last laugh -12/31/2014, 1:26 PM

Free speech -12/31/2014, 1:16 PM

New Year's resolutions -- sort of -12/31/2014, 9:22 AM

A flat-footed backflip for Wall Street -12/31/2014, 9:22 AM

Dim the lights -12/31/2014, 9:22 AM

Some near-sure bets for the new year -12/31/2014, 9:21 AM

Adios, Rick Perry -12/30/2014, 8:20 AM

Budget strife means high-anxiety session -12/30/2014, 8:20 AM

Time for caution -12/30/2014, 8:20 AM

-12/29/2014, 10:01 AM

Court's raw deal -12/29/2014, 10:01 AM

Chris Christie's pork barrel politics -12/29/2014, 10:00 AM

A Festivus Miracle -12/27/2014, 4:18 PM

Faith, not politics, keeps Christ in Christmas -12/27/2014, 4:18 PM

EPA rule falls short -12/27/2014, 4:18 PM

2014: The year in Kansas higher education -12/26/2014, 9:39 AM

Methane from cattle -12/26/2014, 9:39 AM

Black progression and retrogression -12/26/2014, 9:38 AM

Up-Lyft-ing Christmas tale -12/25/2014, 1:22 PM

Terrorism on soft targets -12/25/2014, 1:22 PM

Story of Christmas -12/25/2014, 1:22 PM

Fabricated column -12/24/2014, 8:21 AM

The Christmas spirit dwells in us all -12/24/2014, 8:21 AM

Celebrating life -12/24/2014, 8:21 AM

A visit from St. Nicholas -12/24/2014, 8:21 AM

A look ahead to the Legislature -12/23/2014, 9:34 AM

There is a Santa Claus -12/23/2014, 9:34 AM

Cuban sanctions need to be lifted -12/23/2014, 9:33 AM

2016 presidential campaign already boring -12/22/2014, 9:08 AM

A rainbow coalition of protests -12/22/2014, 9:07 AM

Budget needs dynamic leadership, not scoring -12/21/2014, 1:06 PM

myTown Calendar

SPOTLIGHT
[var top_story_head]

What would you change, if you could?

Published on -2/14/2013, 9:53 AM

Printer-friendly version
E-Mail This Story

I watched the Letterman show last week, when Chris Christie pulled a sticky doughnut out of his pocket and took a bite in Letterman's face. His attitude was so apparent: "You think I'm fat? Here's what I think about you thinking about my fat!"

It's Christie's charm that he'll face down a bully, wherever he finds one. He does not suffer fools who speculate. He has the confidence to claim his individuality and defy those who dare take a swipe at him, as Letterman has done.

I laughed about it the next day, actually, while I was finding The Hays Daily News article about the number of people who think we should just let those with bad habits die from their weaknesses. As that theory goes, smokers and the morbidly obese, along with addicts and the disabled, are drains on the health care system and if they die sooner, no problem. At least we're not paying for their health care.

How cynical and sanctimonious.

It is possible to accept the anomalies of nature as natural in themselves. A natural system addresses every need and recognizes every person, without qualification.

Scientists have discovered it is possible to manipulate enzymes and change the sequences in our DNA that are markers for addiction or disease. The question rises: If you could, would you remove the addiction? Would you cure obesity? Alzheimer's? Cancer?

There are no clear lines of acceptability, so is it still an abomination to change DNA? Would you have a Beethoven or a Matisse or a Thoreau if you did? Was Joan D'Arc inspired or schizophrenic?

The health care debate brings forward the argument of personal freedom. The self-determined say "It's my life, it's my death, mind your own darn business." Society influences these things by popular consensus. I remember when there were ashtrays in the doctor's office waiting room, and watched education over time change the attitudes toward tobacco.

It's impossible to make a logical reach to subsidizing tobacco farms, but there you have it. We subsidize tobacco, we tax it, we legislate it, we have created an environment of antipathy against its use -- and we still have smokers.

The scientific community is vigilant in changing attitudes, but surely it's important to note that while we whip up the dogs to fight tobacco addiction we also are paying for its survival as an industry.

We do the same thing with fast food and genetically engineered food products that may or may not have an impact on obesity or cancer. We haven't demanded enough that these products are objectively studied, but it's OK to complain about Fatty McFat and consider imposing restrictions on Fatty's health care. The current system of health care delivery operates under a strange morality that allows the cruelty of denying care to anyone while building the environment that makes them sick.

The system is built for profit and not for anybody's actual health. When the single payer option was taken off the table in the national health care bill, it became a given that taxpayer money spent on corporate bureaucracy is preferable to spending that money on the actual taxpayers.

Is health care a privilege or a right? The system rises from the public wealth, either way. If public tax money is being spent on the continuation of the monumental, corporate health care system, bloated as it is with middlemen and hedge funders, then shouldn't everyone automatically get the same share of the pie? The business model to our health care system fails because we pay in but we are not shareholders.

Which kind of bureaucracy do you want, a public service or a corporate behemoth? Which one has real oversight? The natural system is one that addresses every need and is productive. We don't have that. Everyone pays in but not everyone has care.

We have a system built on penalty. If you can't pay the company you suffer.

If you're ever the person sitting in a doctor's office with no insurance card to hand in, those attitudes and influences get personal. Those who cannot pay do not get the same health care as those in the system, and are often charged more. Those without membership can forget the doctor, preventative measures, pharmacy, continuing care or hospice. Even those with membership are given a rutty playing field when their insurance can change the terms at any time, for any reason.

What about the right to life, then?

It's disingenuous to assert that anybody really cares about the actual health issues. Chris Christie can eat all the doughnuts he wants, he has insurance and we've already paid for the corn syrup solids in his snacks. Smokers pay extra taxes, paying forward for the future inconveniences of bad health. Drugs with heinous side effects don't need further review. Monsanto can dominate the ag industry engineering the seed and producing the chemicals that kill pests and weeds that evolve past the engineering. Money is being made and that's the important thing.

It is a hypocritical morality that inhibits real health, but we accept the ethical compromise under the guise of economic stability.

It's a sham argument. We can demand more for ourselves. It's our money they're throwing around.

Mary Hart-Detrixhe is a lifelong resident of the prairie and Ellis county. Her work can be found at www.janeQaverage.com.

digg delicious facebook stumbleupon google Newsvine
More News and Photos

Associated Press Videos

AP Breaking News