www.mozilla.com Weather Central
Voices
Headlines

Taking stock and looking ahead -5/24/2013, 10:02 AM

Holiday precaution -5/24/2013, 10:02 AM

Just who are the idiots in this scenario? -5/24/2013, 10:02 AM

Plan lacking -5/24/2013, 10:02 AM

Fat cats must sublet my people go -5/23/2013, 9:50 AM

Scandal season at Obama White House -5/23/2013, 9:50 AM

Hope for the best -5/22/2013, 3:20 PM

Pulling out the radio and remembering -5/22/2013, 10:41 AM

In Florida, timely injustice -5/22/2013, 10:40 AM

What happened, Mr. President? -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

August 2014 primaries will be the test -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

Tornado season -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

Celebrating 90 years of Rotary -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

Facts matter -5/20/2013, 9:18 AM

What in the world was the IRS thinking? -5/20/2013, 9:18 AM

Jolie decision sparks hostility, suspicion -5/20/2013, 9:18 AM

Privatization can work, but only if done right -5/19/2013, 3:11 PM

Still fighting over a lost cause -5/19/2013, 3:11 PM

A Kansas education -5/19/2013, 3:11 PM

Anti-American lessons abound -5/17/2013, 9:34 AM

George Carlin said that? Wowzer! -5/17/2013, 9:34 AM

A safer Fourth -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

For a good cause -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

Conservative's response -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

The time has come to tax the titans -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

Free to fly in the face of convention -5/15/2013, 9:44 AM

County approval -5/15/2013, 9:44 AM

Ignoring the real, fighting the imaginary -5/15/2013, 9:43 AM

Congratulations -5/15/2013, 9:43 AM

Scrutiny of IRS -5/14/2013, 2:15 PM

We must learn from our shared history -5/14/2013, 10:01 AM

The big test -5/14/2013, 10:01 AM

Policymaking crosses paths with busywork -5/14/2013, 10:01 AM

Failed attempt to run away from life -5/13/2013, 9:46 AM

Carpe apple, swallow the seeds -5/13/2013, 9:46 AM

Old adage applies - buyer beware -5/12/2013, 6:50 AM

Tilting at constitutional windmills -5/12/2013, 3:53 PM

County proposal -5/12/2013, 3:53 PM

An honest examination of race -5/10/2013, 9:40 AM

Maintaining the tradition of charitable giving -5/10/2013, 9:40 AM

Help is available -5/10/2013, 9:40 AM

Play it safe on the farm -5/9/2013, 6:48 AM

Where's the progress? -5/9/2013, 9:50 AM

Big doins' at the Golden Rule Cafe -5/9/2013, 9:50 AM

No new tax? -5/9/2013, 9:50 AM

Religious assault -5/9/2013, 9:32 AM

Pondering the new 'bleeding' Kansas -5/8/2013, 10:04 AM

War on Terror: Up close and personal -5/8/2013, 9:39 AM

County in need -5/8/2013, 12:40 PM

Selfless service -5/7/2013, 10:10 AM

Life-changing -5/7/2013, 10:10 AM

Kansas tax policy on the road to nowhere -5/7/2013, 10:09 AM

Administration hands over political ammo -5/7/2013, 10:09 AM

In Texas, black means future danger -5/6/2013, 9:30 AM

Can schools draw line on abortion protests? -5/6/2013, 9:29 AM

Crucial investment -5/6/2013, 9:29 AM

When will it stop -5/5/2013, 3:41 PM

Cork still stuck -5/5/2013, 3:41 PM

Red-state radicalism hastens rural decline -5/5/2013, 3:41 PM

Evolving door -5/5/2013, 3:41 PM

The big picture? -5/3/2013, 7:56 AM

Following up on what's the matter with Kansas -5/3/2013, 7:56 AM

The Wonderful Writers of Oz -5/2/2013, 10:23 AM

Busy month of activities in Kansas Room -5/2/2013, 10:23 AM

Backing the bond -5/2/2013, 10:23 AM

Keystone decision -5/2/2013, 9:26 AM

Defending bad laws -5/1/2013, 9:45 AM

Hefty return -5/1/2013, 9:45 AM

Shining a light -5/1/2013, 9:44 AM

Lessons we learned after Boston -5/1/2013, 9:44 AM

Exposed -4/30/2013, 10:55 AM

Tight-lipped gov masters the 'no comment' -4/30/2013, 10:55 AM

Contributing factor -4/30/2013, 10:55 AM

Changing America -4/30/2013, 10:55 AM

Bills focus on protection, education -4/30/2013, 10:46 AM

Even in tragedy, a nation divided -4/29/2013, 9:08 AM

Wolves in journalistic clothing -4/29/2013, 9:08 AM

KanCare puzzle -4/28/2013, 11:35 AM

'I told you so! Why didn't you listen?' -4/28/2013, 11:35 AM

Special election -4/28/2013, 9:45 AM

Easy answer -4/26/2013, 7:26 AM

Upgrade a necessity -4/26/2013, 7:26 AM

Veiled purpose -4/26/2013, 7:26 AM

Taking steps to prevent bone loss -4/26/2013, 9:45 AM

Safe Ride -4/26/2013, 9:45 AM

Considering the baby-faced bomber -4/25/2013, 10:59 AM

Stop, Shop and Grow campaign kicks off -4/25/2013, 10:59 AM

A conservative's response -4/25/2013, 10:59 AM

The family that eats together stays together -4/24/2013, 9:52 AM

Still learning lessons about education -4/24/2013, 9:52 AM

The Army goes off the grid -4/24/2013, 9:51 AM

Taxing the 'Net -4/24/2013, 9:51 AM

Estimates mean tax debate isn't over -4/23/2013, 9:56 AM

Public business or 'private' conversation? -4/23/2013, 9:56 AM

Do more with less -4/23/2013, 9:56 AM

Sales pitch -4/23/2013, 9:55 AM

Rand Paul gets schooled at Howard -4/22/2013, 1:19 PM

Movement on judges, not liquor sales -4/22/2013, 1:19 PM

Sales tax or property tax? -4/21/2013, 5:08 PM

Where are the leaders, the outrage? -4/21/2013, 5:08 PM

myTown Calendar

SPOTLIGHT
[var top_story_head]

A closer look at the Senate Eight

Published on -6/24/2012, 12:38 PM

Printer-friendly version
E-Mail This Story

In a confusing election year Kansas voters will have the opportunity to shape the direction of state politics and government. However, in the August primary elections, Republican voters in eight select Senate districts will exercise an oversized impact as they determine whether to vote for or against the "Senate Eight," eight incumbent state senators targeted for defeat by a conservative coalition led by Gov. Sam Brownback.

This conservative coalition wants these Republican primary voters to purge the current leadership of the Kansas Senate, specifically President Steve Morris, Hugoton, and Majority Leader Jay Emler, Lindsborg; and key committee chairs Pete Brungardt, Salina; Carolyn McGinn, Sedgwick; Tim Owens, Overland Park; Vicki Schmidt, Topeka; Jean Schodorf, Wichita; and Ruth Teichman, Stafford.

The coalition has recruited candidates to defeat the Senate Eight, and the Kansas Chamber of Commerce political action committee has stepped forward as the chief enforcer for the coalition. The Chamber PAC has pledged to raise and spend $1 million to expel the Senate Eight, as well as any other legislative candidate who, it believes, has stepped out of line or refuses to pledge allegiance to its agenda of cutting taxes and shrinking government.

Conservative leaders believe that eradication of the Senate Eight will chasten legislators throughout Kansas and make the litmus tests, no-tax pledges, and score cards of interest groups associated with the coalition even more effective in forcing political discipline in the upcoming elections and in future legislative sessions.

The chamber PAC's track record in purging dissident Republican legislators is not stellar. In 2010, the chamber PAC targeted 10 incumbent House Republicans for defeat and fell far short as nine of the 10 were re-elected. Further, Republican voters generally favor incumbents as fewer than one in six challengers have prevailed over the past 20 years.

The 2012 elections may change history, however. The conservative alliance now has, as never before, a true believer in the governor's office. Brownback wants to transform state governance with an unwieldy assemblage of interest groups that seek to restrain government on economic issues, such as taxing and spending, and enlarge the reach of government on social issues such as abortion and evolution, among others. Never before has the coalition mounted a sustained campaign, slated candidates statewide, and pledged to spend $1 million in doing so.

Republican voters residing in the districts of the Senate Eight should prepare to be deluged with campaign propaganda much of it negative over the next six weeks, likely a continuing stream of attack ads from undisclosed sources, dozens of mailers of a similar flavor, robo calls, and distortions galore. Separate the wheat from the chaff by asking yourself:

Do I want be represented by Republican legislators who march in lockstep with the conservative coalition led by Brownback and allied with interest groups, such as the chamber PAC, Americans for Prosperity and Kansans for Life, among others?

Or do I want to be represented by Republican legislators who view themselves as "traditional" Republicans and trace their lineage to Kansas icons such as Landon, Eisenhower, Dole and a long list of Republican governors and legislative leaders? These traditional Republicans believe the state should meet its obligations in funding for education and assistance to vulnerable residents and at the same time exercise restraint on taxing and spending. They have questions about the conservative agenda and are willing to propose alternatives.

They view the state Legislature as an independent branch of government, and do not believe Republican legislators are obliged to be in agreement with a Republican chief executive on every issue.

On Aug. 7, Republican voters in eight Senate districts will make choices of extraordinary importance to the future of Kansas government and politics and in doing so will shape the lives of all Kansans in fundamental ways.

H. Edward Flentje is a professor at Wichita State University.

digg delicious facebook stumbleupon google Newsvine
More News and Photos

Associated Press Videos