www.mozilla.com Weather Central
Voices
Headlines

Ballot measures -10/31/2014, 11:10 AM

Roberts not the answer -10/30/2014, 10:25 AM

See the signs -10/30/2014, 10:23 AM

Incumbents always win -10/30/2014, 10:23 AM

Convention center -10/30/2014, 10:23 AM

Schodorf for SOS -10/30/2014, 10:14 AM

Supermarket shenanigans -10/29/2014, 10:19 AM

Americans can fix the Senate -10/29/2014, 10:19 AM

A plea to city commissioners -10/28/2014, 8:58 AM

Having no price tag -10/28/2014, 8:58 AM

Leiker understands -10/28/2014, 8:58 AM

Justice doing his job -10/28/2014, 8:58 AM

Kansas and Greg Orman -10/28/2014, 8:58 AM

'Surplus' KDOT money needed in western KS -10/28/2014, 8:58 AM

Ready for a budget spin -10/28/2014, 8:58 AM

Dishonest mailing -10/28/2014, 8:58 AM

Changing Republicans -10/27/2014, 10:02 AM

Follow the votes -10/27/2014, 10:02 AM

Shameful attempts -10/27/2014, 10:02 AM

Slanderous ads repulsive -10/27/2014, 10:02 AM

Medicare experiment -10/27/2014, 10:02 AM

Profile, or die -10/27/2014, 10:02 AM

Important issues -10/27/2014, 10:01 AM

Politics at their finest -10/27/2014, 10:01 AM

Most important election -10/26/2014, 4:02 PM

Enough is enough -10/26/2014, 4:02 PM

Is Roberts on final lap? -10/26/2014, 4:02 PM

Democrat turned Brownback supporter -10/26/2014, 4:02 PM

Editor Bradlee; For it All, 'Thank You' -10/26/2014, 4:02 PM

Davis for governor -10/26/2014, 4:02 PM

Roberts a changed man -10/26/2014, 4:02 PM

Time to stay the course -10/26/2014, 4:02 PM

Embarrassing economists -10/24/2014, 9:13 AM

Sherow for House -10/24/2014, 5:07 PM

It can't get crazier (wanna bet?) -10/24/2014, 9:04 AM

Digital distractions -10/23/2014, 10:01 AM

Orman for Senate -10/23/2014, 10:01 AM

Federal persecutors -10/23/2014, 10:00 AM

More ed cuts coming -10/22/2014, 5:38 PM

Leiker is the answer -10/22/2014, 5:38 PM

Sun shining on schools? -10/22/2014, 5:38 PM

Airline a great addition -10/22/2014, 5:38 PM

Huelksamp: ideologue extraordinaire -10/22/2014, 5:38 PM

Kids do count -10/22/2014, 10:31 AM

Needing the past in the future? -10/22/2014, 10:31 AM

In praise of hunting -10/22/2014, 10:30 AM

What is a CID? Will it work for mall? -10/21/2014, 10:22 AM

Judging importance on the ballot -10/21/2014, 10:22 AM

Kansas Speaks -10/21/2014, 10:22 AM

Paying for schools -10/19/2014, 1:21 PM

Joining forces for Orman -10/19/2014, 1:21 PM

Research before voting -10/19/2014, 1:21 PM

Davis is moderate? -10/19/2014, 1:21 PM

The most important election in your lifetime -10/19/2014, 1:21 PM

Huelskamp stands out -10/19/2014, 1:21 PM

Kansas farm interests -10/19/2014, 1:21 PM

Keeping unfounded reports from 'going viral' -10/19/2014, 1:21 PM

The age of cynicism -10/18/2014, 9:02 AM

Preventable diseases -10/17/2014, 10:28 AM

Second term needed -10/17/2014, 10:28 AM

Kansans deserve better -10/17/2014, 10:28 AM

Officially killing Americans -10/17/2014, 10:27 AM

New era at FHSU -10/16/2014, 10:01 AM

Roberts is right choice -10/16/2014, 10:01 AM

Crumbling Constitution -10/16/2014, 9:52 AM

Redbelly's future -10/16/2014, 9:52 AM

Kansas deserves better -10/15/2014, 10:23 AM

Remember to vote on Nov. 4 -10/15/2014, 10:23 AM

You almost feel sorry for Sean Groubert -10/15/2014, 10:23 AM

Register to vote -10/14/2014, 10:14 AM

Living on that 70 percent -10/14/2014, 10:14 AM

New bullying problem for schools: parents -10/14/2014, 10:14 AM

Cheerios, marriage equality, the Supreme Court -10/13/2014, 9:49 AM

Wedded bliss -10/12/2014, 5:54 PM

Who is the real fraud? -10/12/2014, 5:08 PM

Teenagers 'make some noise' -10/12/2014, 5:08 PM

Not so private property -10/10/2014, 10:01 AM

Federal funding -10/10/2014, 10:01 AM

Teacher indoctrination -10/10/2014, 10:01 AM

Vote Republican -10/9/2014, 9:49 AM

Non-partisan politics -10/9/2014, 9:49 AM

Teen driver safety week Oct. 19 to 25 -10/9/2014, 9:04 AM

FHSU party -10/9/2014, 10:11 AM

Poverty in America -10/9/2014, 10:11 AM

Let the women serve -10/9/2014, 10:11 AM

Time for new direction -10/8/2014, 9:49 AM

Improving Kansas economically -10/8/2014, 9:35 AM

Water abusers -10/8/2014, 9:35 AM

Play safe on the farm -10/8/2014, 9:34 AM

Where the money comes from -10/7/2014, 10:24 AM

The president's security -10/7/2014, 10:24 AM

Marriage equality -10/7/2014, 10:24 AM

The sins of the father are visited -10/6/2014, 9:02 AM

Cannabis in America: The bottom line -10/6/2014, 9:20 AM

A reason to celebrate -10/6/2014, 9:20 AM

Gov. shields wealthy from paying for schools -10/5/2014, 2:07 PM

Passionate protest in defense of civil disorder -10/5/2014, 2:07 PM

October is time for baseball and, of course, film premieres -10/4/2014, 2:16 PM

Alley cleanup -10/3/2014, 10:01 AM

Will the West defend itself? -10/3/2014, 10:01 AM

myTown Calendar

SPOTLIGHT
[var top_story_head]

Don't give up

Published on -9/10/2012, 10:05 AM

Printer-friendly version
E-Mail This Story

I am responding to the letter from Chad and Julie Archer of Bel Aire, the foster parents who wanted to quit fostering because of a negative experience with St. Francis Community Services.

The Archers felt this agency did not do enough to keep a child they fostered from being reintegrated with the biological parents. They had the child for 18 months and were very bonded with the child. The Archers felt there were safety factors that should have prohibited the child from being returned.

I have never worked for St. Francis and am certainly not qualified to pass judgment on their efficiency and do not know all the contributing factors surrounding this case. I was employed as a case manager/therapist for a similar foster care agency in Wichita for several years and know full well the pain that is felt at times when the child is returned to the parents after spending time with foster parents. On one hand, we ask foster parents to care and nurture this child and treat them as their own; on the other, we also ask that they don't get too attached in case the child is reintegrated back into the biological home.

I don't think anyone would disagree that the foster care system is broken. We hear sad cases on the news about a child falling "through the cracks" when child protective services should have followed through on an abuse/neglect case. Case workers are overloaded, overstressed and underpaid. They do the best they can with limited resources and little time. But in the end, the decision to return a child to their biological parents is determined by a judge, not the foster care agency. There were times, as a case worker, that I strongly felt the child would be better off in the beautiful, well cared for, loving foster care home they were in instead of being returned home. But the courts believe the child should be with their biological parents unless there is a radical case of abuse or neglect. I would often leave the courtroom, shaking my head, wondering what the judge was thinking.

Having said that, I have seen first hand the power of the mother/child bond between children and their parents. I have seen foster homes like the Archers where the foster parents care for a child in a lovely home and the child is given everything they could want or need. Yet I have also seen, in spite of this, that the child wants to be with his biological parents, no matter to what extent the abuse or neglect may have been. There seems to be a biological bond there that cannot be broken. A case in hand is an adopted child whose adoptive parents have given him the world; a good education, a nice home, every electronic device made. Yet how often does the child, when he arrives at adulthood, seek out his biological parents, particularly the mother? They want to know their history, who they "are," if they look like their parents. Does this tell us anything about the material things we heap on our kids in the quest to "give them everything they want," when, in reality, the things they want have no monetary value? Does it not make you want to spend all day Sunday with your kids, knowing that your time and attention means more than all the videogames you bought them for Christmas?

In defense of some biological parents whose children have been placed in foster care: Believe it or not, some of them are simply ignorant. Ignorant about parenting, ignorant about cleaning a house, ignorant about balancing a checkbook. Sometimes they use parenting techniques handed down from their parents, like a "good" whipping with a belt, belittling a child, yelling at them.

After several months of parenting classes and education in everyday tasks, the child can be returned to the parents, many times with good results. Unfortunately, kids don't come with a manual and some parents need to be taught how to parent.

I implore the Archers to reconsider giving up fostering. There are so many children who need you. Don't let a bad experience stop you from helping a child. It isn't the child's fault that us "big people" make bad decisions. The Archers need to know that the care given during this very important attachment period of the child as an infant will make a difference in how this child lives the rest of his or her life. It is probably the most important developmental stage in a child's life and you, the Archers, have played a major role.

I have not checked the platforms about the foster care system by the presidential candidates.

Perhaps one of them can produce an answer to this country's foster care problems. In the interim, we need to have caring foster care parents like the Archers for our foster children.

Phyllis Stuart, Hays, licensed professional counselor

digg delicious facebook stumbleupon google Newsvine
More News and Photos

Associated Press Videos

AP Breaking News
Kansas News