www.mozilla.com Weather Central
Voices
Headlines

Giving thanks for blessings as Kansans -11/25/2014, 10:11 AM

Local fixes to local problems? -11/25/2014, 10:11 AM

Energy security -11/25/2014, 10:11 AM

Pipeline politics -11/24/2014, 10:04 AM

They killed Peter Kassig -11/24/2014, 10:04 AM

Going from bad to good on election night -11/23/2014, 6:38 PM

Free Speech can be shield or a sword -11/23/2014, 6:38 PM

Dodge City merger -11/22/2014, 6:38 PM

House mis-speaker -11/21/2014, 9:50 AM

Obama vs. Us -11/21/2014, 9:50 AM

Really smart conservatives love public debt -11/21/2014, 9:50 AM

Official welcome -11/20/2014, 9:52 AM

Control freaks in the U.S. -11/20/2014, 1:24 PM

How did we get here? -11/20/2014, 9:52 AM

An open letter to the GOP -11/19/2014, 10:03 AM

Successful farming -11/19/2014, 10:03 AM

Getting personal -11/18/2014, 9:15 AM

Teachers, not facilities -11/18/2014, 9:15 AM

Schoolteachers and the Legislature -11/18/2014, 9:06 AM

Water vision -11/18/2014, 9:06 AM

I see wonderful things -11/17/2014, 9:26 AM

Politics prevail over truth in Kansas elections -11/17/2014, 9:26 AM

Progress at mall -11/16/2014, 5:22 PM

Opinions on the general election -11/16/2014, 5:22 PM

Why are schools afraid of freedom? -11/16/2014, 5:22 PM

Educational fraud -11/14/2014, 9:42 AM

The American public gets smart -11/14/2014, 9:41 AM

State revenue -11/13/2014, 4:48 PM

Staying positive -11/13/2014, 2:14 PM

Democracy delusions -11/13/2014, 2:14 PM

An awesome tribute -11/13/2014, 2:14 PM

Military underpaid -11/12/2014, 2:15 PM

Success for Moran -11/12/2014, 11:54 AM

Shop wisely when you go -11/12/2014, 11:53 AM

2014: The year of no ideas -11/12/2014, 11:52 AM

Veterans Day -11/11/2014, 10:13 AM

A new start for veterans' health care -11/11/2014, 10:13 AM

Awaiting Brownback's mark -11/11/2014, 10:13 AM

Roberts and catcalls heard 'round the world -11/10/2014, 9:18 AM

Honoring all who served -11/10/2014, 9:18 AM

Brownback coalition prevails -11/9/2014, 6:03 PM

Seeing the news is necessary -11/9/2014, 6:02 PM

Immigration reform -11/9/2014, 6:02 PM

Scholar-athlete charade -11/7/2014, 8:32 AM

How about a beer and a short break? -11/7/2014, 8:32 AM

Fighting poverty -11/7/2014, 8:32 AM

Voting his mind, apparently -11/6/2014, 9:51 AM

Electing liberty -11/6/2014, 9:50 AM

UNC's troubles -11/6/2014, 9:50 AM

Fast-food pay -11/5/2014, 2:32 PM

Oil, natural gas driving security -11/5/2014, 10:20 AM

Ellis' future -11/5/2014, 10:19 AM

Family ties -11/5/2014, 10:19 AM

Quarantine questions -11/4/2014, 10:03 AM

Counting non-voter votes -11/4/2014, 10:03 AM

Low blows -11/4/2014, 10:03 AM

Take country back -11/3/2014, 4:36 PM

Big First Tea Party endorses Roberts -11/3/2014, 4:36 PM

Changing times -11/3/2014, 4:27 PM

Elect an Independent -11/3/2014, 4:27 PM

Leiker excels -11/3/2014, 4:27 PM

Watching decline -11/3/2014, 4:27 PM

Lack of respect -11/3/2014, 9:58 AM

Holding memories for Aunt Millie -11/3/2014, 9:53 AM

Playing the game -11/3/2014, 9:53 AM

Vote responsibly -11/3/2014, 9:53 AM

Sherow is change -11/3/2014, 9:53 AM

Silly season and cynical strategies -11/3/2014, 9:52 AM

No endorsement -11/3/2014, 9:52 AM

Thank you, Hays -11/3/2014, 9:52 AM

Another Koch division? -11/2/2014, 5:09 PM

A Matter of truth -11/2/2014, 5:09 PM

-11/2/2014, 5:09 PM

Leiker for House -11/2/2014, 5:08 PM

Bottom of barrel -11/2/2014, 5:08 PM

Candidate asks for support -11/1/2014, 5:09 PM

Roberts serves Kansas -11/1/2014, 5:09 PM

Face of the experiment -10/31/2014, 4:36 PM

Leiker fits the bill -10/31/2014, 4:18 PM

Ellis has a choice -10/31/2014, 3:06 PM

Health-care truth -10/31/2014, 2:55 PM

Dropping the ball -10/31/2014, 2:55 PM

Governor's tricks -10/31/2014, 2:44 PM

Ballot measures -10/31/2014, 11:10 AM

Marijuana debate -10/30/2014, 2:44 PM

Republican crossover -10/30/2014, 2:35 PM

Roberts not the answer -10/30/2014, 10:25 AM

See the signs -10/30/2014, 10:23 AM

Incumbents always win -10/30/2014, 10:23 AM

Convention center -10/30/2014, 10:23 AM

Schodorf for SOS -10/30/2014, 10:14 AM

Supermarket shenanigans -10/29/2014, 10:19 AM

Americans can fix the Senate -10/29/2014, 10:19 AM

A plea to city commissioners -10/28/2014, 8:58 AM

Having no price tag -10/28/2014, 8:58 AM

Leiker understands -10/28/2014, 8:58 AM

Justice doing his job -10/28/2014, 8:58 AM

Kansas and Greg Orman -10/28/2014, 8:58 AM

'Surplus' KDOT money needed in western KS -10/28/2014, 8:58 AM

Ready for a budget spin -10/28/2014, 8:58 AM

myTown Calendar

SPOTLIGHT
[var top_story_head]

Pride of Arizona

Published on -3/4/2014, 10:13 AM

Printer-friendly version
E-Mail This Story

Many states, including Kansas, have considered passing legislation that would protect religious liberties of business owners at the expense of the rights of their gay customers. Only one state, however, has seen such a bill move through the legislature and on to the governor for a signature.

To her credit, last week Arizona Republican Gov. Jan Brewer vetoed that state's proposed law. The governor cited threatened backlash from national companies, the potential for blatant discrimination, and the fact no Arizona business man or woman were claiming their religious liberties were under attack.

"The bill is broadly worded and could result in unintended and negative consequences," Brewer said.

Instead, another setback is being experienced by those fighting the so-called gay agenda. Opponents of same-sex marriage who not that long ago were celebrating one successful constitutional amendment after another, now are seeing those state laws being struck down. Already, same-sex marriage bans have been declared unconstitutional in Oklahoma, Utah and Texas -- with more on the way.

The tide is turning in America, and staunch social conservatives increasingly are holding the short straw. Or so they imagine.

"This is going to continue to be a major problem, and it's going to spread across the country," said Family Research Council President Tony Perkins. "Who's going to protect the rights of Christians and religious people? That's the question that has to be answered."

The answer is easy, although it comes in two parts. And we would preface it by saying there is no movement underway to infringe anybody's sincerely held religious beliefs. Even if there was, the glorious First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution quickly would squelch any such attempt.

It is the same First Amendment that will protect the rights of Christians and religious people. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ..." explicitly allows any religion -- not merely Christians -- to practice as they see fit. Well, mostly. Religious leaders cannot, for example, sacrifice human lives on their altars even if the entire congregation has consented to such a practice. And we've seen numerous courts troubled by parents who withhold medical care for children that results in unnecessary deaths.

Most reasonable people would agree with the relatively few limitations placed on religious groups by laws articulated by mere mortals.

The second part of the answer involves the specificity Perkins requested about Christians. Despite all the rhetoric and Internet-fueled theories regarding the religious nature of the nation's Founding Fathers, Christians have no more or less status in this country than other faiths. Feel free to ignore the Declaration of Independence, the preamble to the Constitution, the Federalist Papers, and the diaries and letters of everybody involved in the creation of these United States of America.

The Constitution is the law of the land, and the establishment clause of the First Amendment is clear. Goverment at any level simply cannot write a law favoring Christians. To do so would violate the rights of Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, agnostics, atheists, etc.

And when it comes to gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered individuals, one cannot write a law that even fits all Christians. There are many mainstream faiths that do not believe in the eternal damnation of any individual based on their sexual orientation.

For the religions that do, they are free to believe so inside their places of worship. They even can believe what they want in their own minds. But if taken into the public square in a manner that discriminates, there are limits.

Gov. Brewer made the correct call in her rejection of Arizona's attempt to legalize discriminatory practices against gay people, even if the reason was economic-based instead of simple human rights.

Unfortunately, this fight is not over. Not in Arizona, not in Kansas, not in most red states across the nation. We would caution the Christians fighting for their "religious freedom" that the end result will not be of their liking. The Constitution will win the day, once again. And there will be another codified limit put in place, this time to protect the rights of all Americans -- particularly the rather substantial population so despised by the fundamentalists.

Editorial by Patrick Lowry

plowry@dailynews.net

digg delicious facebook stumbleupon google Newsvine
More News and Photos

Associated Press Videos

AP Breaking News