www.mozilla.com Weather Central
Voices
Headlines

Taking stock and looking ahead -5/24/2013, 10:02 AM

Holiday precaution -5/24/2013, 10:02 AM

Just who are the idiots in this scenario? -5/24/2013, 10:02 AM

Plan lacking -5/24/2013, 10:02 AM

Fat cats must sublet my people go -5/23/2013, 9:50 AM

Scandal season at Obama White House -5/23/2013, 9:50 AM

Hope for the best -5/22/2013, 3:20 PM

Pulling out the radio and remembering -5/22/2013, 10:41 AM

In Florida, timely injustice -5/22/2013, 10:40 AM

What happened, Mr. President? -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

August 2014 primaries will be the test -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

Tornado season -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

Celebrating 90 years of Rotary -5/21/2013, 9:38 AM

Facts matter -5/20/2013, 9:18 AM

What in the world was the IRS thinking? -5/20/2013, 9:18 AM

Jolie decision sparks hostility, suspicion -5/20/2013, 9:18 AM

Privatization can work, but only if done right -5/19/2013, 3:11 PM

Still fighting over a lost cause -5/19/2013, 3:11 PM

A Kansas education -5/19/2013, 3:11 PM

Anti-American lessons abound -5/17/2013, 9:34 AM

George Carlin said that? Wowzer! -5/17/2013, 9:34 AM

A safer Fourth -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

For a good cause -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

Conservative's response -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

The time has come to tax the titans -5/16/2013, 9:44 AM

Free to fly in the face of convention -5/15/2013, 9:44 AM

County approval -5/15/2013, 9:44 AM

Ignoring the real, fighting the imaginary -5/15/2013, 9:43 AM

Congratulations -5/15/2013, 9:43 AM

Scrutiny of IRS -5/14/2013, 2:15 PM

We must learn from our shared history -5/14/2013, 10:01 AM

The big test -5/14/2013, 10:01 AM

Policymaking crosses paths with busywork -5/14/2013, 10:01 AM

Failed attempt to run away from life -5/13/2013, 9:46 AM

Carpe apple, swallow the seeds -5/13/2013, 9:46 AM

Old adage applies - buyer beware -5/12/2013, 6:50 AM

Tilting at constitutional windmills -5/12/2013, 3:53 PM

County proposal -5/12/2013, 3:53 PM

An honest examination of race -5/10/2013, 9:40 AM

Maintaining the tradition of charitable giving -5/10/2013, 9:40 AM

Help is available -5/10/2013, 9:40 AM

Play it safe on the farm -5/9/2013, 6:48 AM

Where's the progress? -5/9/2013, 9:50 AM

Big doins' at the Golden Rule Cafe -5/9/2013, 9:50 AM

No new tax? -5/9/2013, 9:50 AM

Religious assault -5/9/2013, 9:32 AM

Pondering the new 'bleeding' Kansas -5/8/2013, 10:04 AM

War on Terror: Up close and personal -5/8/2013, 9:39 AM

County in need -5/8/2013, 12:40 PM

Selfless service -5/7/2013, 10:10 AM

Life-changing -5/7/2013, 10:10 AM

Kansas tax policy on the road to nowhere -5/7/2013, 10:09 AM

Administration hands over political ammo -5/7/2013, 10:09 AM

In Texas, black means future danger -5/6/2013, 9:30 AM

Can schools draw line on abortion protests? -5/6/2013, 9:29 AM

Crucial investment -5/6/2013, 9:29 AM

When will it stop -5/5/2013, 3:41 PM

Cork still stuck -5/5/2013, 3:41 PM

Red-state radicalism hastens rural decline -5/5/2013, 3:41 PM

Evolving door -5/5/2013, 3:41 PM

The big picture? -5/3/2013, 7:56 AM

Following up on what's the matter with Kansas -5/3/2013, 7:56 AM

The Wonderful Writers of Oz -5/2/2013, 10:23 AM

Busy month of activities in Kansas Room -5/2/2013, 10:23 AM

Backing the bond -5/2/2013, 10:23 AM

Keystone decision -5/2/2013, 9:26 AM

Defending bad laws -5/1/2013, 9:45 AM

Hefty return -5/1/2013, 9:45 AM

Shining a light -5/1/2013, 9:44 AM

Lessons we learned after Boston -5/1/2013, 9:44 AM

Exposed -4/30/2013, 10:55 AM

Tight-lipped gov masters the 'no comment' -4/30/2013, 10:55 AM

Contributing factor -4/30/2013, 10:55 AM

Changing America -4/30/2013, 10:55 AM

Bills focus on protection, education -4/30/2013, 10:46 AM

Even in tragedy, a nation divided -4/29/2013, 9:08 AM

Wolves in journalistic clothing -4/29/2013, 9:08 AM

KanCare puzzle -4/28/2013, 11:35 AM

'I told you so! Why didn't you listen?' -4/28/2013, 11:35 AM

Special election -4/28/2013, 9:45 AM

Easy answer -4/26/2013, 7:26 AM

Upgrade a necessity -4/26/2013, 7:26 AM

Veiled purpose -4/26/2013, 7:26 AM

Taking steps to prevent bone loss -4/26/2013, 9:45 AM

Safe Ride -4/26/2013, 9:45 AM

Considering the baby-faced bomber -4/25/2013, 10:59 AM

Stop, Shop and Grow campaign kicks off -4/25/2013, 10:59 AM

A conservative's response -4/25/2013, 10:59 AM

The family that eats together stays together -4/24/2013, 9:52 AM

Still learning lessons about education -4/24/2013, 9:52 AM

The Army goes off the grid -4/24/2013, 9:51 AM

Taxing the 'Net -4/24/2013, 9:51 AM

Estimates mean tax debate isn't over -4/23/2013, 9:56 AM

Public business or 'private' conversation? -4/23/2013, 9:56 AM

Do more with less -4/23/2013, 9:56 AM

Sales pitch -4/23/2013, 9:55 AM

Rand Paul gets schooled at Howard -4/22/2013, 1:19 PM

Movement on judges, not liquor sales -4/22/2013, 1:19 PM

Sales tax or property tax? -4/21/2013, 5:08 PM

Where are the leaders, the outrage? -4/21/2013, 5:08 PM

myTown Calendar

SPOTLIGHT
[var top_story_head]

In-state tuition

Published on -3/22/2013, 10:27 AM

Printer-friendly version
E-Mail This Story

Students attending postsecondary institutions in Kansas fall into two categories: Those who pay in-state tuition and those who pay out-of-state rates. The difference is significant. In-state rates are less than half what the non-resident pays.

In 2004, the Legislature decided any student who graduated from a Kansas high school and had lived in the state for at least three years qualified for in-state tuition rates -- regardless of residency status. Lawmakers then were under the impression it wasn't fair to punish children with higher tuition merely because their parents weren't legal citizens. The law didn't benefit a great number of Kansas kids, nor did it raise many objections. The grumbling that did occur dissipated after learning the state wasn't paying for the students to attend college.

A challenge to the status quo emerged this year, courtesy of a state official whose passion appears to make life as difficult as possible for immigrants. Secretary of State Kris Kobach was the lead supporter of repealing in-state tuition for Kansas students without legal residency.

"I think that is an absurd reverse incentive," Kobach said during House Bill 2192's hearing in front of the House Federal and State Affairs Committee. "If you follow the law, we're charging you three times more."

Kobach was referring to the fact Regents schools charge out-of-state tuition to students from foreign countries, and those youths need to obtain student visas. The "reverse incentive," in Kobach's mind, is that families entering the country illegally get a benefit they don't deserve.

First of all, this year there are 630 immigrants paying in-state tuition. Of those, more than 500 attend community college. Is Secretary Kobach suggesting families enter the country and live here for three years for the primary purpose of getting discounts on two years' worth of community college? That is difficult to imagine.

We don't believe the secretary is looking at revenue-enhancements for the schools, either. If all 630 students were to switch to the higher rate, the incremental dollar gain would be $1.8 million. Of course, assuming those families merely were gaming the system, they wouldn't be in Kansas. The loss of those 630 college students would be $3.9 million.

It sounds as if Kobach, who sideline business is making life difficult for immigrants around the country, just wanted to stir things up some more in Kansas.

Thankfully, the House committee didn't bite. No action was taken on the bill.

And at least one lawmaker reframed the conversation in a manner we found refreshing. Rep. Ponka-We Victors, D-Wichita and the only Native American serving in the Legislature, offered this: "I think it's funny, Mr. Kobach, because when you mention illegal immigrant, I think of all of you."

We hope this is the last we hear about attempts to punish Kansas teens for the decisions of their parents.

Editorial by Patrick Lowry

plowry@dailynews.net

digg delicious facebook stumbleupon google Newsvine
More News and Photos

Associated Press Videos