www.mozilla.com Weather Central
Voices
Headlines

Embarrassing economists -10/24/2014, 9:13 AM

Sherow for House -10/24/2014, 9:13 AM

It can't get crazier (wanna bet?) -10/24/2014, 9:04 AM

Digital distractions -10/23/2014, 10:01 AM

Orman for Senate -10/23/2014, 10:01 AM

Federal persecutors -10/23/2014, 10:00 AM

Kids do count -10/22/2014, 10:31 AM

Needing the past in the future? -10/22/2014, 10:31 AM

In praise of hunting -10/22/2014, 10:30 AM

What is a CID? Will it work for mall? -10/21/2014, 10:22 AM

Judging importance on the ballot -10/21/2014, 10:22 AM

Kansas Speaks -10/21/2014, 10:22 AM

Paying for schools -10/19/2014, 1:21 PM

Joining forces for Orman -10/19/2014, 1:21 PM

Research before voting -10/19/2014, 1:21 PM

Davis is moderate? -10/19/2014, 1:21 PM

The most important election in your lifetime -10/19/2014, 1:21 PM

Huelskamp stands out -10/19/2014, 1:21 PM

Kansas farm interests -10/19/2014, 1:21 PM

Keeping unfounded reports from 'going viral' -10/19/2014, 1:21 PM

The age of cynicism -10/18/2014, 9:02 AM

Preventable diseases -10/17/2014, 10:28 AM

Second term needed -10/17/2014, 10:28 AM

Kansans deserve better -10/17/2014, 10:28 AM

Officially killing Americans -10/17/2014, 10:27 AM

New era at FHSU -10/16/2014, 10:01 AM

Roberts is right choice -10/16/2014, 10:01 AM

Crumbling Constitution -10/16/2014, 9:52 AM

Redbelly's future -10/16/2014, 9:52 AM

Kansas deserves better -10/15/2014, 10:23 AM

Remember to vote on Nov. 4 -10/15/2014, 10:23 AM

You almost feel sorry for Sean Groubert -10/15/2014, 10:23 AM

Register to vote -10/14/2014, 10:14 AM

Living on that 70 percent -10/14/2014, 10:14 AM

New bullying problem for schools: parents -10/14/2014, 10:14 AM

Cheerios, marriage equality, the Supreme Court -10/13/2014, 9:49 AM

Wedded bliss -10/12/2014, 5:54 PM

Who is the real fraud? -10/12/2014, 5:08 PM

Teenagers 'make some noise' -10/12/2014, 5:08 PM

Not so private property -10/10/2014, 10:01 AM

Federal funding -10/10/2014, 10:01 AM

Teacher indoctrination -10/10/2014, 10:01 AM

Vote Republican -10/9/2014, 9:49 AM

Non-partisan politics -10/9/2014, 9:49 AM

Teen driver safety week Oct. 19 to 25 -10/9/2014, 9:04 AM

FHSU party -10/9/2014, 10:11 AM

Poverty in America -10/9/2014, 10:11 AM

Let the women serve -10/9/2014, 10:11 AM

Time for new direction -10/8/2014, 9:49 AM

Improving Kansas economically -10/8/2014, 9:35 AM

Water abusers -10/8/2014, 9:35 AM

Play safe on the farm -10/8/2014, 9:34 AM

Where the money comes from -10/7/2014, 10:24 AM

The president's security -10/7/2014, 10:24 AM

Marriage equality -10/7/2014, 10:24 AM

The sins of the father are visited -10/6/2014, 9:02 AM

Cannabis in America: The bottom line -10/6/2014, 9:20 AM

A reason to celebrate -10/6/2014, 9:20 AM

Gov. shields wealthy from paying for schools -10/5/2014, 2:07 PM

Passionate protest in defense of civil disorder -10/5/2014, 2:07 PM

October is time for baseball and, of course, film premieres -10/4/2014, 2:16 PM

Alley cleanup -10/3/2014, 10:01 AM

Will the West defend itself? -10/3/2014, 10:01 AM

Find another school -10/3/2014, 10:01 AM

It's better now -10/2/2014, 9:17 AM

The answer is to bomb Mexico? -10/2/2014, 9:17 AM

Falling revenue -10/2/2014, 9:17 AM

School facilities -10/1/2014, 9:27 AM

Look ahead, not back -10/1/2014, 9:27 AM

Secret Service needs to step up its game -10/1/2014, 9:27 AM

Roosevelts were true leaders -9/30/2014, 9:18 AM

Moral bankruptcy -9/30/2014, 9:18 AM

Expect some sort of change in Topeka -9/30/2014, 9:18 AM

'A tale of two countries' -9/29/2014, 9:59 AM

The last of the Willie Horton ads? -9/29/2014, 9:59 AM

Finding answers to the future of Kansas -9/28/2014, 2:20 PM

College: Where religious freedom goes to die -9/28/2014, 2:20 PM

Honoring Hammond -9/28/2014, 2:20 PM

Do statistical disparities mean injustice? -9/26/2014, 9:53 AM

World university rankings -9/26/2014, 9:52 AM

Kansas experiment -9/26/2014, 9:52 AM

Two anti-choice parties -9/25/2014, 10:03 AM

Not in the same old Kansas anymore -9/25/2014, 10:03 AM

Domestic violence -9/25/2014, 10:03 AM

Back to war we go -9/24/2014, 9:55 AM

Piling on the NFL -9/24/2014, 9:54 AM

Emma Watson looking for a few good men -9/24/2014, 9:54 AM

Renter runaround -9/23/2014, 7:32 PM

Enough is enough -9/23/2014, 9:02 AM

Life of politics in the state -9/23/2014, 9:02 AM

What is and is not child abuse -9/22/2014, 9:30 AM

Cannabis politics and research -9/22/2014, 9:30 AM

Future of The Mall -9/21/2014, 6:14 PM

Multiculturalism is a failure -9/19/2014, 9:52 AM

State education rankings -9/19/2014, 9:52 AM

Kobach gone wild -9/19/2014, 9:52 AM

Bias prevents civil discussion of education issues -9/18/2014, 9:35 AM

Immigration is American -9/18/2014, 9:35 AM

Costs to states not expanding Medicaid -9/17/2014, 10:14 AM

Medicare threats -9/17/2014, 10:12 AM

myTown Calendar

SPOTLIGHT
[var top_story_head]

Wind power

Published on -12/8/2013, 12:15 PM

Printer-friendly version
E-Mail This Story

Two weeks ago and with little fanfare, the Ellis County Commission easily was able to accomplish what was impossible a mere seven years ago. The commissioners signed agreements that pave the way for a wind farm to be built between Hays and Ellis.

Spread out over 28,500 acres north of Interstate 70, plans are in place for Buckeye Wind Energy to erect approximately 105 turbines capable of producing a collective 200 megawatts of renewable energy.

"This has been in the works for seven years," Commissioner Swede Holmgren said. "Finally, to come in on the 25th of November and say you're now clear to sink a spade in the ground and start construction. Hopefully, we have won over some of those folks who weren't in favor of wind early on."

Not to dash the commissioner's hopes, but of all the things that have changed since then, winning over the anti-wind crowd was not one. All those principled positions effectively were quieted by moving the project's location.

More pertinent changes were new faces on the county commission, none of whom belong to the Ellis County Environmental Awareness Coalition. That group, which successfully organized a grassroots opposition movement, faded away after the Iberdrola wind farm proposal was stopped dead in its tracks.

Ellis County not only put in place all the appropriate zoning and regulations since then, it also hired a professional administrator to keep the county's business dealings organized, predictable and stable.

Fort Hays State University also brought two turbines online that have performed as advertised and without incident.

But we believe the single biggest factor contributing to Buckeye Wind's successful application was the placement of the farm. Getting the turbines north of the interstate was critical.

We have no doubt the wind farm will deliver the desired green energy to the national grid. As a state, Kansas still has the third highest amount of potential wind power in the country. And all of the data collected suggest Ellis County could be one of the top producers in the state.

County coffers will benefit as a result of the Buckeye project. In addition to signing road maintenance and decommissioning agreements, the two parties reached a deal regarding payments in lieu of taxes. The county will receive $600,000 each of the first two years, increasing to $800,000 for year three and go up 1 percent annually from that point.

"I think all three of these agreements represent a good balance between protecting the interests of the county as well as not overburdening the project," said Dennis Davidson, legal counsel for the county regarding wind issues.

Buckeye Wind Energy is scheduled to begin construction on the project before the end of the year in order to take advantage of federal tax credits.

This particular wind farm project attracted no arguments or debates about water flow underground or surface water runoff being disrupted, potential harm to wildlife, health risks of low frequency noise, possible eye or brain damage from the incessant blinking lights, danger of ice chunks being hurled from the blades, interference with communications, aesthetics of the viewshed, declining property values, the blizzards of shrapnel that could occur if a tornado hit a turbine, and all of the other objections raised in 2007.

We can explain their absence in one of three ways:

* All of the concerns since have been proven unfounded;

* Having a county administrator handling the process professionally and openly squashes any uninformed rumors from taking hold; or

* Those protesting back then truly were NIMBYs who couldn't care less if all those bad things happen outside of their neighborhood.

It doesn't matter at this point. What does is that Ellis County is about to take part in harnessing the power of the wind. Congratulations to everybody involved in bringing this project to fruition.

Editorial by Patrick Lowry

plowry@dailynews.net

digg delicious facebook stumbleupon google Newsvine
More News and Photos

Associated Press Videos

AP Breaking News